PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10295920

Demystifying the boardroom. Tips for timid trustees.

Abstract

The complexity of a modern hospital can mystify and intimidate trustees; they may have difficulty understanding how the hospital works and thus may feel unable to contribute to its success. Stripping away some of the mystery may enable them to more effectively fulfill their roles to "hold in trust" and "govern." Some strategies trustees can use to gain control include hiring a chief executive officer (CEO) who can communicate, remembering who works for whom, assuming that anyone who makes more than $80,000 a year expects to earn it, and stifling the urge to seek "fairness." To clarify the relationship between board and CEO, trustees should ask the following questions: Are all subsystems contributing to the system's overall goals, or are some serving their own ends? Does the system allow interaction among subsystems to promote synergy, or does it isolate the parts? How does the CEO plan to produce the required product or service and achieve profit goals within the organizational policies? How will the trustees know whether the intended product or service has been produced within the organizational policies at the desired profit? By following a code of conduct, trustees will become more effective. The seven elements of the code include observing behaviors and reporting observations, asking questions and insisting on clear answers, establishing relationships with constituencies, making decisions and being willing to explain those decisions, making sure solutions fit problems, realizing that management is a series of approximations, and seeing that adherence to the hospital's mission dominates the criteria used in free choices.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R R McDaniel, R A Anderson. 1989. Demystifying the boardroom. Tips for timid trustees.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10295920/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗