PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10299607

Medicare program, utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) reconsiderations and appeals--HCFA. Proposed rule.

Abstract

This proposed rule would implement that portion of the Peer Review Improvement Act of 1982 (Title I, Subtitle C of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, Pub. L. 97-248) addressing reconsiderations and appeals of PRO denial determinations. The proposed regulations would establish procedures for (1) a PRO to reconsider both its denial determinations regarding the medical necessity, reasonableness and appropriateness of health care service furnished or proposed to be furnished to a Medicare beneficiary in a health care institution and the application of the limitation of liability provision; (2) administrative appeals to the Department following a PRO reconsidered determination; and (3) judicial review following an administrative hearing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1984-07-17. Medicare program, utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) reconsiderations and appeals--HCFA. Proposed rule.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10299607/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Guidelines for guidelines.

Practice guidelines are proliferating in medicine. In addition to methodological problems that cause guidelines to be outdated rapidly, they are plagued by conflicts of interest. They are largely consensus opinions of panels of experts, most of whom are supported by industry. Professional societies, health insurers, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and dialysis providers also benefit from guidelines. Little attention is paid to the potential for harm to patients, and to the profession of medicine, from the widespread use of guidelines.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗