PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 10301611

Should we support catastrophic coverage?

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B Berney. 1987. Should we support catastrophic coverage?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10301611/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The economics of catastrophic health insurance.

Currently over 41 million Americans lack health insurance and would experience severe financial stress if faced with a major illness. Catastrophic health insurance has been proposed as a means of addressing this problem. This study utilizes the National Medical Expenditures Survey of 34,400 households to calculate the cost of catastrophic medical coverage under a number of different assumptions. Estimates of the annual cost range from $109.2 billion to $149 billion, depending upon the size of the deductible, and whether a means test is used to determine degree of coverage. Given the current antideficit climate in Washington, an expense of this magnitude cannot simply be added to the Federal budget. Instead, a simple funding proposal is suggested that provides more than adequate resources to finance the program. Specifically, universal catastrophic coverage would provide insurance companies with relief from approximately $175 billion in medical bills, more than enough to fund even the most ambitious of the proposals.

Catastrophic Illness