PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10309378

Current practices in performance appraisal.

Abstract

A survey of 196 private voluntary social service agencies showed that two methods of performance appraisal were most widely used in evaluating employee performance, i.e., essays and rating scales. The results-oriented method of performance appraisal, generally viewed in management literature as the most effective approach to performance evaluation, was not widely used. The primary purposes of performance appraisal were seen by agencies participating in the research as performance improvement and salary or wage increment. The author reviews the strengths and weaknesses of alternative methods of performance appraisal currently used in human service agencies. The results-oriented method of employee evaluation is discussed with an emphasis on the implementation of this performance appraisal technique.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V R Wiehe. 1980. Current practices in performance appraisal.. https://doi.org/10.1300/j147v04n03_01

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Empowerment evaluation: building communities of practice and a culture of learning.

Empowerment evaluation is the use of evaluation concepts, techniques, and findings to foster improvement and self-determination. Program participants--including clients--conduct their own evaluations: an outside evaluator often serves as a coach or additional facilitator depending on internal program capabilities. Empowerment evaluation has three steps: 1) establishing a mission; 2) taking stock; and 3) planning for the future. These three steps build capacity. They also build a sense of community, often referred to as communities of practice. Empowerment evaluation also helps to create a culture of learning and evaluation within an organization or community.

Employee Performance Appraisal↗

Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review.

This article provides a meta-analysis of the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and 3 central theories of performance motivation (goal-setting, expectancy, and self-efficacy motivation). The quantitative review includes 150 correlations from 65 studies. Traits were organized according to the five-factor model of personality. Results indicated that Neuroticism (average validity = -.31) and Conscientiousness (average validity = .24) were the strongest and most consistent correlates of performance motivation across the 3 theoretical perspectives. Results further indicated that the validity of 3 of the Big Five traits--Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Conscientiousness--generalized across studies. As a set, the Big Five traits had an average multiple correlation of .49 with the motivational criteria, suggesting that the Big Five traits are an important source of performance motivation.

Employee Performance Appraisal↗