PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10310446

Final prospective payment rules contain important revisions.

Abstract

The final rules for the first year of Medicare's prospective payment contain a number of crucial revisions of the interim rules: Payment standards. Because of a revised estimate of inflation, the adjusted federal standardized payment amounts have been reduced about $12. Update factors. Revised inflation updating factors will be applied to the hospital-specific portion of payment rates and will reflect a lower (0.1 percent) budget-neutrality adjustment. Outliers. For the three-year transitional period, additional payments for outlier patients will be based entirely on a smaller percentage of the federal payment amounts. Permissible charges to beneficiaries. Hospitals may charge beneficiaries for custodial care and medically unnecessary services before the day-outlier threshold is passed if the hospital or its utilization review committee determines that the beneficiary no longer needs inpatient care; this determination is confirmed by the attending physician or external medical review entity; and the patient is notified of the determination and potential charges. Periodic interim payment. This payment may be adjusted semiannually, or more frequently at a hospital's request. Biweekly payments will be made for items reimbursed on a reasonable-cost basis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P L Grimaldi. 1984. Final prospective payment rules contain important revisions.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10310446/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Reliability of diagnoses coding with ICD-10.

OBJECTIVE: Reliability of diagnoses coding is essential for the use of routine data in a national health care system. The present investigation compares reliability of diagnoses coding with ICD-10 between three groups of coding subjects. METHOD: One hundred and eighteen students coded 15 diagnoses lists, 27 medical managers from hospitals 34 discharge letters, and 13 coding specialists 12 discharge letters. Agreement in principal diagnosis was assessed using Cohen's Kappa and the fraction of coincidences over the number of pairs, agreement for the full set of diagnoses with a previously developed measure p(om). RESULTS: Kappa values were fair (managers) or moderate (coders) for terminal codes with 0.27 and 0.42 (agreement 29.2% versus 46.8%), substantial for the chapter level with 0.71 and 0.72 (agreement 78.3% versus 80.8%). p(om) was lower for the full set of diagnoses than for principal diagnoses, for example in case of managers with 0.21 versus 0.29 for terminal codes. Best results were achieved by students coding diagnoses lists. In summary, the results are remarkably lower than in earlier publications. CONCLUSION: The refinement of the ICD-10 accompanied by innumerous coding rules has established a complex environment that leads to significant uncertainties even for experts. Use of coded data for quality management, health care financing, and health care policy requires a remarkable simplification of ICD-10 to receive a valid image of health care reality.

Diagnosis-Related Groups↗