PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10312134

Dealing with a shifting paradigm.

Abstract

In 1970, T. S. Kuhn, in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions argued that scientists work by creating a comprehensive model--a model he called "a paradigm." A paradigm, Kuhn said, is an encompassing world view that tells us what facts to pay attention to and what to ignore. He contended that, although we may think that we consider all the facts and ask all the questions, there is always some ordering and selection going on, and we must first be prepared by our paradigm to make sense of what we see. He stated that one of the first signs that a paradigm is shifting is the discovery of facts that seem significant and indisputably true but cannot be explained by the current model. The essential elements, according to Kuhn, that are required for a paradigm to shift are a strong stimulus, a rapidly changing environment, and the realization that whether the change is good or bad is essentially of no significance. The parties most closely involved are frequently the last to appreciate that the shift has occurred.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R P Kaufman. Dealing with a shifting paradigm.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10312134/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The new economics.

Current NHS finance mechanisms use activity-based models that do not measure individual services. Economic policies that measure profitability of different services can drive improvement and efficiency. Monitor is looking at the introduction of a requirement for foundation trusts to implement these policies, and will shortly be consulting on the processes involved.

Economics, Hospital↗

Determinants of hospital closure in South Korea: use of a hierarchical generalized linear model.

Understanding causes of hospital closure is important if hospitals are to survive and continue to fulfill their missions as the center for health care in their neighborhoods. Knowing which hospitals are most susceptible to closure can be of great use for hospital administrators and others interested in hospital performance. Although prior studies have identified a range of factors associated with increased risk of hospital closure, most are US-based and do not directly relate to health care systems in other countries. We examined determinants of hospital closure in a nationally representative sample: 805 hospitals established in South Korea before 1996 were examined-hospitals established in 1996 or after were excluded. Major organizational changes (survival vs. closure) were followed for all South Korean hospitals from 1996 through 2002. With the use of a hierarchical generalized linear model, a frailty model was used to control correlation among repeated measurements for risk factors for hospital closure. Results showed that ownership and hospital size were significantly associated with hospital closure. Urban hospitals were less likely to close than rural hospitals. However, the urban location of a hospital was not associated with hospital closure after adjustment for the proportion of elderly. Two measures for hospital competition (competitive beds and 1-Hirshman--Herfindalh index) were positively associated with risk of hospital closure before and after adjustment for confounders. In addition, annual 10% change in competitive beds was significantly predictive of hospital closure. In conclusion, yearly trends in hospital competition as well as the level of hospital competition each year affected hospital survival. Future studies need to examine the contribution of internal factors such as management strategies and financial status to hospital closure in South Korea.

Economics, Hospital↗