PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10312886

Managing during a merger.

Abstract

In the November-December 1988 issue of Physician Executive, Dr. Marks' article outlined typical reactions to the uncertainty of being involved in a merger or consolidation. The article introduced the concept of the "merger syndrome," which encompasses executives' stressful reactions to a combination and the development of a crisis management orientation. The bottom line, if the syndrome is allowed to go unchecked, can be marred executive and employee performance and poor financial and operational results. The merger syndrome is a prime reason that two-thirds of all mergers and acquisitions are financial failures. Consumed by their reactions to mergers, executives frequently lose touch with the needs of employees. In this article, the author summarizes steps that can be taken by executives to help their employees cope with the trauma of merger; to minimize negative employee reactions, such as reduced productivity and increased turnover; and to build effective postmerger teams.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M L Marks. Managing during a merger.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10312886/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗