PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 10313154

Integration vs. interface.

Abstract

To conclude, system interfaces and system integration have specific uses based on the individual hospital's assessment of current and future needs. For the short-term, interfaces can provide a level of increased functionality without the upheaval of current operations. On the long-term considerations, the cost may factor negatively against the hospital's long-term information requirements and its inability to move and adapt quickly as the healthcare environment changes. Integrated systems, while requiring conversion from current interfaced systems, provide the functions and flexibility that serve a hospital's immediate and long-term information needs and enable it to survive in an increasingly-volatile healthcare environment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Bodenbender. 1989. Integration vs. interface.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10313154/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

['Medical technology assessment'; more than just efficacy].

'Medical technology assessment' means investigating the developments, costs and effects of medical technologies. Practising physicians increasingly are confronted with consequences of management based on such research results. In order to follow and participate in the discussion they should be aware of this and know the jargon. In policy problems, measures of effect in natural units (e.g. cardiovascular mortality) offer advantages over measures of clinical findings (e.g. decrease of the serum cholesterol levels). Survival in various health states and disorders can be compared by multiplying the number of life years gained by a factor for the quality of life in those years. Costs are usually expressed in monetary terms. These may be calculated as direct medical costs on the basis of fees or actual costs for society. The latter is the case when the balancing is based on a societal perspective. The societal perspective enables a more objective assessment of health effects than when a patient perspective is used. 'Incremental cost effectiveness' expresses where extra expenditures will have maximum effect, and bears higher relevance for policy decisions than mean costs per unit of effect. Immaterial matters are more difficult to assess, but should nevertheless be considered in selecting the policy to be implemented.

Cost-Benefit Analysis