PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10315397

Long-term oxygen therapy delivery systems.

Abstract

Three major systems are currently available in most urban settings for the delivery of long-term oxygen therapy. These are compressed oxygen in tanks, liquid oxygen, and oxygen concentrators. Each system has advantages and disadvantages. The choice of system for any individual patient must be based on relative cost, the need for portability, and safety features. The cost of oxygen and regulations governing its reimbursement vary widely throughout the country. Oxygen should be supplied by reputable vendors who meet specific criteria for assuring quality service. In many instances referral to a home care agency for teaching and supervision of the patient is essential. Patient compliance with long-term oxygen therapy is often poor due to factors such as lack of significant subjective improvement, unrealistic fears or embarrassment concerning use of oxygen, and feelings of depression or hopelessness that the patient may experience when told he needs oxygen.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G J McDonald. 1983. Long-term oxygen therapy delivery systems.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10315397/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Palliative care support teams and the commitment of primary care teams to terminally ill patients in their homes].

OBJECTIVE: To find out if the activity of palliative care support teams (PCST) does not negatively influences the performance of the primary care "care of terminally ill patients" service. PARTICIPANTS: Terminally ill patients cared for at home. DESIGN: Multicentre observational study. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The observed variable is the increase in the number of registered patients in primary care, and the number of patients covered between the years 2002 and 2003 and the 4 intervention variables are: total visits, joint visits, assessments, and teaching sessions. RESULTS: The number of patients covered in 2002 was 41.19%, increasing to 45.44% in 2003. The activity rate of the PCST for each 100 000 inhabitants was 526 home visits in 2003, 86.15 joint visits, 313.68 professional assessments, and 23.14 teaching sessions. The joint visits and the teaching sessions were strongly associated with an improvement in the coverage of primary care (Pearson correlation of 0.784 and 0.759, respectively). The total visits were moderately associated (0.525) and the assessments were weakly associated (0.245). CONCLUSIONS: Joint visits and teaching sessions of a PCST are associated to an increase in the activity of primary care teams. Assessments and total visits did not have a negative influence.

Home Care Services↗