PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10317805

Same-day surgery: management issues and future growth.

Abstract

Policy makers in all countries are searching for cost-effective, quality health care. In the realm of surgical care, one response to modern cost and quality pressures is same-day surgery. This article discusses three aspects of same-day surgery programs: key management issues; analysis of competitiveness; and, the growth potential of same-day surgery. Today's managers of same-day surgery programs are most concerned with issues related to their customers, be they physicians, insurers, or patients. Indeed, program managers identify market research, program development, and patient, physician, and facility management as areas critical to success. An exploratory survey carried out of ten same-day centers indicates that programs must excel in two areas to succeed. First, they must develop efficient and appropriate operations. Second, they must communicate aspects of these operations to different customers, realizing that each customer type is interested in different aspects of the program. This article provides a framework for the analysis of customer interests. It also suggests that surgery centers satisfy customer preferences rather better than do hospital outpatient programs. Same-day surgery will increase. Uncertainty lies in how quickly and in what form such activities in hospitals and centers will develop. Countries will likely experience different growth patterns, according to the relative power of factors affecting both the supply and demand of same-day surgery.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Westman. Same-day surgery: management issues and future growth.. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.4740010305

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory cerebral palsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The literature was reviewed to describe the role of gait analysis in the orthopaedic management of ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and examine the current best evidence to support these roles. RECENT FINDINGS: Gait laboratory analysis is superior to visual or observational analysis of gait because it provides an objective record of gait that is able to quantify the magnitude of deviations of pathologic gait from normal and also explain these abnormalities. Recognizable gait patterns can be classified and used for making treatment decisions, the effectiveness of which can be assessed using gait analysis as a measure of gait outcomes. There are many sources of variability, however, including patients themselves, the gait laboratories and testing processes, interpretation of data and surgeons' surgical recommendations. SUMMARY: Although gait analysis has been shown to alter decision making, there is little evidence that the decisions based on gait analysis lead to better outcomes. Consequently, clinical gait analysis remains controversial, with wide variation in the rates of utilization of gait analysis in the management of children with ambulatory cerebral palsy. The time is ripe for clinical trials and cohort studies to provide the evidence to establish the appropriate utilization of this technology.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗