PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10321844

Neonatal resuscitation--a practical assessment.

Abstract

Current European neonatal resuscitation guidelines (Zideman et al. Resuscitation 1998;37:103-110) advocate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at 120 compressions per minute in a ratio of 3:1. This is commonly interpreted as a net rate, thus requiring delivery of 40 breaths per minute, which is the upper end of the range of 30-40 breaths per minute suggested in the guidelines. At least one other interpretation is available, but the correct one is not specified. No studies have evaluated whether the rates inferred by the guidelines can be achieved. This study assesses the ability of trained hospital providers to fulfil these criteria in a simulated arrest scenario. A group of anaesthetists, paediatricians, midwives and neonatal nurses was asked to perform CPR either as single rescuers or in pairs, for 5 min, following European Resuscitation Council guidelines. Breaths and compressions delivered were measured by inductance plethysmography. The number of breaths delivered in the first and fifth minute of the scenario were measured, as well as the quality of delivered breaths. Of 33 single resuscitators, none were able to deliver 40 breaths per minute in either the first minute (range 11-34; median 20; interquartile range 14-26) or the fifth (13-35; 19; 15.25-26.5). Of 18 pairs of rescuers, four achieved 40 breaths per minute in the first minute (24-45; 33.5; 29.75-38.25) but only three of 17 were able to sustain this to the fifth minute (21-48; 35; 30.5 39). One pair did not complete 5 min of resuscitation. Single rescuers were unable to achieve the rate of CPR suggested by current guidelines. Only 22% of paired rescuers were able to achieve this standard in the first minute, falling to less than 20% by the fifth minute. We recommend modifying the guidelines to make them unambiguous and practicable, with the emphasis shifted onto the quality of compressions and ventilations, rather than quantity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S D Whyte, A K Sinha, J P Wyllie. 1999. Neonatal resuscitation--a practical assessment.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9572(98)00143-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of ventilation and chest compression performance by bystanders using the Impact Model 730 ventilator and a conventional bag valve with mask in a model of adult cardiopulmonary arrest.

"Bystanders" or lay persons are typically the first caregivers to attend to a victim of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Astronaut crew medical officers (CMO) play a similar role to bystanders aboard the International Space Station (ISS). Studies have demonstrated the importance of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) for patient survival before the arrival of emergency medical care. Recent apprehension from bystanders about the threat of contracting communicable diseases during BCPR, however, has led to the consideration of other ventilation systems such as the bag-valve mask (BVM) and automatic transport ventilators (ATV). BVM use is called for during CPR aboard the ISS. This study evaluated the ventilation and compression performance of 40 basic CPR-trained bystanders using either a BVM (adult-sized self-inflating bag with face mask) or an ATV (Model 730 ventilator (M730), Impact Instrumentation, Inc., West Caldwell, NJ). Each two-bystander team gave BCPR to a simulated cardiopulmonary arrest victim using the 2-breath/15-compression cycle for 4 min and then switched roles for another 4-min interval. Compared to BVM use, the M730 led to significantly (p<0.05) lower number of breaths, smaller tidal volumes, airway flows, airway pressures, volume of gas entering the stomach per breath and chest compressions for the 4-min period. The M730 also enabled a bystander to meet the recommendation of 4-breath and compression cycles per minute as per Guidelines 2000. Lastly, ease-of-use scores were significantly higher for the M730 compared to the BVM. Overall, the data suggest that the M730 improves the quality of performance for a bystander performing BCPR.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗