PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 10324448

Learning in action.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Gourlay. 1986-11-27. Learning in action.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10324448/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Natural gradient learning for over- and under-complete bases In ICA.

Independent component analysis or blind source separation is a new technique of extracting independent signals from mixtures. It is applicable even when the number of independent sources is unknown and is larger or smaller than the number of observed mixture signals. This article extends the natural gradient learning algorithm to be applicable to these overcomplete and undercomplete cases. Here, the observed signals are assumed to be whitened by preprocessing, so that we use the natural Riemannian gradient in Stiefel manifolds.

Learning

Complexity issues in natural gradient descent method for training multilayer perceptrons.

The natural gradient descent method is applied to train an n-m-1 multilayer perceptron. Based on an efficient scheme to represent the Fisher information matrix for an n-m-1 stochastic multilayer perceptron, a new algorithm is proposed to calculate the natural gradient without inverting the Fisher information matrix explicitly. When the input dimension n is much larger than the number of hidden neurons m, the time complexity of computing the natural gradient is O(n).

Learning

Online learning from finite training sets and robustness to input bias.

We analyze online gradient descent learning from finite training sets at noninfinitesimal learning rates eta. Exact results are obtained for the time-dependent generalization error of a simple model system: a linear network with a large number of weights N, trained on p = alphaN examples. This allows us to study in detail the effects of finite training set size alpha on, for example, the optimal choice of learning rate eta. We also compare online and offline learning, for respective optimal settings of eta at given final learning time. Online learning turns out to be much more robust to input bias and actually outperforms offline learning when such bias is present; for unbiased inputs, online and offline learning perform almost equally well.

Learning