PubMed · 10326139
Occlusion contributes to temporal processing differences between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis in random-dot displays.
Abstract
Stereoscopic depth discrimination was investigated in crossed and uncrossed directions using stimuli defined by binocular disparity differences embedded in dynamic random-dot stereograms. Across three experiments, fixation was directed to a point on the display screen (which placed crossed stimuli in front of and uncrossed stimuli behind, the background dots of the stereogram), to a point in front of the display screen (which placed both crossed and uncrossed stimuli in front of the background dots), and to a point behind the display screen (which placed both crossed and uncrossed stimuli behind the background dots). Results showed that depth discrimination was always good when the stimuli appeared in front of the background dots of the stereogram, whereas discrimination was always poor when the stimuli appeared behind the background dots. These results suggest that differences between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis as reported in past research arose, in part, from effects related to occlusion.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
S Becker, C Bowd, S Shorter, K King, R Patterson. 1999. Occlusion contributes to temporal processing differences between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis in random-dot displays.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00110-2
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.