PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10327326

Multisite stimulation in refractory heart failure.

Abstract

Since the early nineties, the employment of DDD pacing from a right ventricular site with a short AV delay in patients with severe heart failure has led to considerable conflicting results, so that the real benefit of this method remains to be defined even in selected patients, such as those with first-degree AV block, QRS duration > 140 ms due to left bundle branch block (LBBB), mitral regurgitation time > or = 450 ms and diastolic filling time < or = 200 ms. Indeed, the asynchronous activation induced by pacing the right apex is the most important limitation to the technique, particularly in patients without an LBBB pattern or in those with an incomplete LBBB pattern. Recent studies have also shown that pacing of the right interventricular septum provides no better results than pacing of the right apex, at least in selected patients with no LBBB pattern and no significant mitral regurgitation. Today, it has been suggested that permanent biventricular pacing could be proposed as a feasible and reliable approach to improving ventricular function through the synchronization of the septum and the apex of the left ventricle, particularly in patients with a marked delay in ventricular activation sequence. This technique may be performed by means of transvenous leads inserted through the coronary sinus into the cardiac veins to stimulate both ventricles simultaneously, starting from the right apex and left lateral wall. Consequently, this approach supplies a strong basis for initiating further studies to examine the chronic effects of left ventricular pacing in patients with severe heart failure. We also suggest that the new tissue Doppler imaging techniques could usefully be applied to accurately select candidates to biventricular pacing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Ansalone, P Trambaiolo, G P Giorda, P Giannantoni, R Ricci, M Santini. 1999. Multisite stimulation in refractory heart failure.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10327326/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Medium-term follow-up and modes of failure following epicardial pacemaker implantation in young children.

AIMS: Young children suffering from congenital or post-operative AV-block require life-long pacemaker stimulation. Due to the anatomical prerequisites initially epicardial electrodes are implanted and the generator is placed in the upper abdominal wall. The following study investigated modes of failure leading to reoperation in this group of technically challenging patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between October 2000 and May 2005, a total of 21 infants (age 3 days to 5 years) underwent pacemaker implantation using a subxyphoidal incision for newborns (and a partial lower or complete median sternotomy for older children). Nine patients had previous cardiac surgery for complex congenital defects. The remaining 12 young children suffered from congenital AV-Block (CAVB). Twenty-one bipolar epicardial electrodes (Medtronic Capsure epi) were fixed to the right ventricle, 15 had additional implantation of a bipolar atrial lead. The pacemaker generator (Medtronic Kappa 701) was implanted into the right upper abdominal wall. Indications for revision were recorded. No mortality was observed; pacing and sensing parameters remained stable up to a 5-year follow-up. A total of four reoperations occurred. Three of the four revisions were caused by ventricular electrode fracture. At revision, two electrodes were broken at the crossing between the pericardial cavity and the abdominal wall, one bipolar lead at the Y-division into the two tip electrodes. One reoperation was due to a pacemaker recall. All revisions were performed without complications. CONCLUSION: In our institute epicardial pacing in young children was associated with a satisfactory clinical outcome, but also a significant number of failures leading to reoperation, mainly due to electrode fracture caused by the muscular activity of this patient group. Reoperations were performed at a low risk.

Cardiac Pacing, Artificial↗

Spectral pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging lateral-to-septal delay fails to predict clinical or echocardiographic outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: The current study sought to assess if pre-implantation lateral-to-septal delay (LSD) > or =60 ms assessed by spectral pulsed-wave myocardial tissue Doppler imaging (PW-TDI) could predict successful long-term outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty patients (72% males, mean age 59 +/- 10 years) who were referred for CRT according to the ACC/ESC guidelines were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent spectral PW-TDI before and 1 year after CRT. Two left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony time intervals, T(O) and T(P) (time to onset and peak of LV myocardial velocity, respectively), LSD were recorded. Left ventricular dyssynchrony was defined as LSD > or =60 ms. Clinical response was defined as an improvement in >1 NYHA class plus improvement in 6-min walk distance (6MWD) > or =25%, echocardiographic response was defined as a > or =15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LV-ESV). One year after CRT, 50 patients (83%) were clinical responders and 47 patients (78%) were echocardiographic responders. Both T(O) and T(P) LV dyssynchrony indices failed to predict echocardiographic CRT outcome. In addition, there were no significant differences between 'synchronous' and 'dyssynchronous' patient populations at baseline or follow-up in either clinical (NYHA class and 6MWD) or echocardiographic (LV ejection fraction, LV end-diastolic, and end-systolic) variables. CONCLUSION: The great majority of patients referred for CRT benefit clinically from it. However, spectral PW-TDI failed to predict CRT outcome. When PW-TDI dyssynchrony was applied for selection of proper CRT patients, up to 80-86% of the patients with synchronous LSD that had proven clinical and echocardiographic benefit from CRT would have been denied CRT.

Cardiac Pacing, Artificial↗