PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10336203

Three-dimensional visualization and analysis methodologies: a current perspective.

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) imaging was developed to provide both qualitative and quantitative information about an object or object system from images obtained with multiple modalities including digital radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography, and ultrasonography. Three-dimensional imaging operations may be classified under four basic headings: preprocessing, visualization, manipulation, and analysis. Preprocessing operations (volume of interest, filtering, interpolation, registration, segmentation) are aimed at extracting or improving the extraction of object information in given images. Visualization operations facilitate seeing and comprehending objects in their full dimensionality and may be either scene-based or object-based. Manipulation may be either rigid or deformable and allows alteration of object structures and of relationships between objects. Analysis operations, like visualization operations, may be either scene-based or object-based and deal with methods of quantifying object information. There are many challenges involving matters of precision, accuracy, and efficiency in 3D imaging. Nevertheless, 3D imaging is an exciting technology that promises to offer an expanding number and variety of applications.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J K Udupa. Three-dimensional visualization and analysis methodologies: a current perspective.. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.19.3.g99ma13783

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of the da Vinci robotic system using both the three-dimensional view (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) view options with traditional manually assisted laparoscopic techniques in performing standardized exercises. METHODS: To evaluate surgical efficiency in the use of robotically assisted and manual laparoscopic surgery for standardized exercises six, last-year medical students without any surgical experience were selected. The exercises consisted of placing rings over receptacles, grasping a free hanging suture and cutting three pieces of it, running a suture, and performing a surgical knot. Each student performed the exercise twice. The median times needed for completion of the exercises and the median number of errors in performing the tasks were noted. RESULTS: The unexperienced students performed the standardized tasks significantly quicker and with fewer errors when assisted by the da Vinci robot in the 3D optical display mode, as compared with traditional manually assisted laparoscopic surgery. Even when the 2D mode was selected, a significant advantage favoring the da Vinci robotic system was seen both in time and efficacy for most exercises. When the 3D and 2D modes were compared, time differences in favor of the 3D mode remained, but a significant difference in efficacy favoring the 3D mode was seen only in one exercise (exercise 2: suture cutting). CONCLUSIONS: The da Vinci robotic system permits standardized minimal invasive surgical exercises to be performed quicker and more efficiently than traditional minimally invasive techniques. Therefore, with the aid of this robotic system, difficult laparoscopic interventions may become easier to perform, and indications for minimal invasive surgery may be expanded.

Data Display↗

Potential pitfalls from variable optical coherence tomograph displays in managing diabetic macular edema.

PURPOSE: To describe potential pitfalls in the use of optical coherence tomography for management of diabetic macular edema. DESIGN: Prospective, noninterventional case series. METHODS: Review of optical coherence tomographs in 13 eyes with clinically significant diabetic macular edema from 11 consecutive patients in a private retina practice. RESULTS: Optical coherence tomography displays are based on 3.5-mm or 6-mm diameter circular grids that look very similar and have identical sector names but schematize different areas of the macula. The numeric outputs for the identically named sectors in the two displays do not differ significantly for retinal thickness but differ significantly in all sectors except the fovea for retinal volume because of the different areas represented by the sectors. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to explicitly note the scale of the optical coherence tomography display can potentially misdirect planned focal and grid laser treatment for diabetic macular edema. Failure to explicitly verify identical optical coherence tomography display scales in longitudinal studies of laser treatment for diabetic macular edema can potentially lead to errors in interpreting treatment efficacy.

Data Display↗