PubMed · 10339288
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Sadusky. Delving deeper.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10339288/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of exercise training and body-awareness training in female patients with Syndrome X. BACKGROUND: Patients with Syndrome X, defined as effort-induced angina pectoris, a positive exercise test and a normal coronary angiogram, suffer from a chronic pain disorder. We hypothesized that this disorder results in physical deconditioning with decreased exertional pain threshold. METHODS: Twenty-six patients were randomly assigned to two training groups (A, B) and a control group (C). Group A (n = 8) started, after baseline measurements, with eight weeks of body-awareness training followed by eight weeks of exercise training on a bicycle ergometer three times a week for 30 min at an intensity of 50% of peak work rate. Group B (n = 8) performed only eight weeks of exercise training. Group C (n = 10) acted as controls without any intervention whatsoever. The effects on exercise performance, hormonal secretion, vascular function, adenosine sensitivity and quality of life were evaluated. RESULTS: Body-awareness training did not change the pain response. The two training groups did not differ in effects of exercise training. Exercise capacity before training was below the gender- and age-matched reference range and improved by 34% with training to a level not different from the reference range. Onset of pain was delayed by 100% from 3 +/- 2 to 6 +/- 3 min (p < 0.05) while maximum pain did not change. Thus the pain-response-to-exercise curve was shifted to the right. Syndrome X patients showed a hypersensitivity to low-dose adenosine infusion compared to healthy age- and gender-matched controls (p < 0.0001) that did not change with exercise training. Endothelium-dependent blood flow increase was at baseline within reference range and tended to increase (p < 0.06) following training. In Group A the concentration of cortisol in urine decreased by 53% after body-awareness training (p < 0.05), and this change from baseline remained after physical exercise training (p < 0.05). A similar decrease occurred with only exercise training (Group B). CONCLUSIONS: Physical deconditioning with lower exertional threshold for pain is a prominent feature in Syndrome X. Physical training in Syndrome X results in an increased exercise capacity with lesser anginal pain. We suggest physical training as an effective treatment in Syndrome X.
STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials was performed. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Exercise therapy is a widely used treatment for low back pain. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of exercise therapy for low back pain with regard to pain intensity, functional status, overall improvement, and return to work. METHODS: The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, Embase, PsycLIT, and reference lists of articles were searched. Randomized trials testing all types of exercise therapy for subjects with nonspecific low back pain with or without radiation into the legs were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Because trials were considered heterogeneous with regard to study populations, interventions, and outcomes, it was decided not to perform a meta-analysis, but to summarize the results using a rating system of four levels of evidence: strong, moderate, limited, or none. RESULTS: In this review, 39 trials were identified. There is strong evidence that exercise therapy is not more effective for acute low back pain than inactive or other active treatments with which it has been compared. There is conflicting evidence on the effectiveness of exercise therapy compared with inactive treatments for chronic low back pain. Exercise therapy was more effective than usual care by the general practitioner and just as effective as conventional physiotherapy for chronic low back pain. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence summarized in this systematic review does not indicate that specific exercises are effective for the treatment of acute low back pain. Exercises may be helpful for patients with chronic low back pain to increase return to normal daily activities and work.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.