PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10343685

A framework for assessing communication in mental illness.

S Kramer·K L Bryan·C D Frith
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Many studies support the notion of semantic and/or pragmatic difficulties in people with mental illness. This paper describes a framework (based on a discourse analysis model) for the assessment and reassessment of communication in mentally ill persons.

Explore related subjects

Communication DisordersHumansLanguage TestsLanguage TherapyMental DisordersSchizophrenic LanguageJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Kramer, K L Bryan, C D Frith. 1998. A framework for assessing communication in mental illness.. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682829809179416

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Phoniatric provision and training: current European perspectives.

Communication disorders represent a major and growing problem worldwide. In Europe, the specialty of phoniatrics has developed partly in response to this important issue. This article reviews training and workforce issues in phoniatrics and raises key questions and issues that need resolution in the future.

Communication Disorders↗
PubMed2006

Towards an international framework for communication disorders: use of the ICF.

UNLABELLED: There has been an interest in the World Health Organization's framework of functioning and disability by those in communication disorders since the original 1980 International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps (ICIDH). In 2001, WHO published the substantially revised International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). This framework is gaining in acceptance as a system that would be beneficial for the field and for our clients. This article describes the basics of the ICF and how it differs from the ICIDH; the possible applications of the ICF to communication disorders; some of the work done with the ICF in communication disorders internationally; and the benefits to the field from increased interdisciplinary and international collaboration using the ICF as a common framework. LEARNING OUTCOMES: As a result of this activity the reader will be able to: (1) describe the basics of the ICF, (2) describe the applications of the ICF to communication disorders, and (3) describe the possible impact upon the field internationally.

Communication Disorders↗
PubMed2006

Evidence-based practice in communication disorders: progress not perfection.

PURPOSE: This commentary is written in response to a companion paper by Nan Bernstein Ratner (Evidence-Based Practice: An Examination of its Ramifications for the Practice of Speech-Language Pathology). METHOD: The comments reflect my experience as Vice President for Research and Technology of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). One of the responsibilities of the Vice President is to monitor the work of the Advisory Committee on Evidence-Based Practice. CONCLUSION: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a challenging but attainable goal for audiology and speech-language pathology. Our professions have made rapid progress in developing the foundations for EBP. To be sure, a great deal of work remains to be done, but we have learned from the experiences of other professions and have built our own systems to support EBP.

Communication Disorders↗