PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10344103

Evidence-based dentistry: a practitioner's perspective.

Abstract

Basing practice decisions on evidence is neither contestable nor new. There are some concerns, however, that must be addressed. First, all published "evidence" is not of equal quality. Second, the practical experience of dentists must be recognized as constituting evidence. Additionally, third parties should not be allowed to use evidence if that use interferes with practitioners' judgment. Fourth, the call for more evidence may place a burden on dental schools already struggling to keep up with their demands of teaching basic dental skills. The Dental Practice Parameters developed by the ADA may provide a more realistic alternative because they preserve practitioner discretion.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F E Aurbach. 1999. Evidence-based dentistry: a practitioner's perspective.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10344103/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Acute and transient psychotic disorders (ICD-10: F23). Empirical data and implications for therapy].

The defining clinical features of acute and transient psychotic disorders (ICD-10: F23) are an acute onset and a duration of psychotic symptoms not exceeding 1-3 months. Previous empirical investigations show that patients with this diagnosis have a favourable prognosis, but also a high risk of relapses (58-77%). The diagnostic stability in the further course of illness seems to be low (34-73%) with a frequent diagnostic change to schizophrenia and affective disorders being observed. As yet, data from controlled clinical trials regarding therapy do not exist. The implications for the treatment of acute and transient psychotic disorders are discussed with this background.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗