PubMed · 10362966
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1999. Documentation tips.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10362966/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: To show the opinions that doctors and nurses express on the organisation and competences of primary care nursing, and on inter-professional relations. DESIGN: Qualitative research study based on the group discussion technique known as Philips 66. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Three discussion groups, one of nurses, one of doctors and a third mixed, with 6 components each, half from Cáceres and the rest from other provinces, and all involved in primary care health delivery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the discussions, the three groups coincided in the importance given to nursing clinics and home visits, in the organisational advantages that the attachment as a norm of the population to a nursing clinic would bring, in the ability of nurses to perform the techniques they have habitually used, and in defence of one sole clinical record per patient. They blamed each other mutually for making few home visits. Doctors attributed to nurses under-use of records and nurses alleged doctors took no notice of their notes. On the question of their relations, doctors thought that nurses did not take on joint responsibility for the work-loads in health centres; and nurses thought that doctors did not wish to share tasks, but rather delegate or order them. CONCLUSIONS: The attachment of the population to nursing clinics would favour the extension of care, the commitment to the population and the real delivery of services, as well as professional autonomy and recognition.
The reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form (SF-36) and the Quality of Life Profile: Senior Version (QOLPSV) for measuring outcomes of home care nursing were evaluated. Data were collected from 50 clients receiving home care nursing services. Twenty-two registered nurses and six registered practical nurses collected client and nursing data on each home visit. Client baseline and outcome measures were collected by two independent evaluators at admission and discharge from the home care service. Internal consistency reliability ranged from.76 to.94 for the eight subscales of the SF-36. Internal consistency reliability ranged from.47 to.82 for the nine subscales of the QOLPSV. The subscales of both instruments had minimal problems with missing responses. The SF-36 was found to be more sensitive than the QOLPSV to change over time. In addition, the subscales of the SF-36 were found to be more sensitive than the subscales of the QOLPSV to several of the nursing variables, such as intensity of the client's nursing condition and skill mix.
This paper outlines the detail of the case study method used in a project commissioned by the English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting (ENB) to investigate the changing educational needs of community nurses with regard to needs assessment and quality of care in the context of the NHS and Community Care Act, 1990. It explains the methodological procedures and analytic processes which led to integration of data across the whole study, focusing on the role of a prior theoretical framework in case study design. Recently qualified practitioners (health visitors and district nurses) were observed during a regular shift (N=134 visits), concentrating on their practice of assessing needs, and on liaison and collaboration within teams and across sectors. They were interviewed after the observation period (N=33 practitioners), to determine the extent of formality they attached to each assessment, and elicit information about aspects which may be embedded in everyday practice as well as those recorded for explicit requirements.The preliminary analysis resulted in the modification of a model for assessing service quality, and identified various points where a 'policy-practice gap' might arise between policies and practice in both the health service and education. The practicalities of operationalising a multiple case study design into research are highlighted, and the mechanism for 'generalising to theory' illustrated.