PubMed · 10367427
Quality assurance in screening programmes.
Abstract
All screening programmes do harm; some also do good. The responsibility of the policy-maker is to decide which programmes do more good than harm at reasonable cost and then introduce them, once they are confident that the screening programme could and will reach the standard of quality required for success. The ratio of benefit to harm is not, however, constant and this relationship demonstrates a shifting balance.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J A Gray, J Austoker. 1998. Quality assurance in screening programmes.. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011742
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.