PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10371891

Rigid fixation in mandibular reconstruction.

Abstract

A primary goal of mandibular reconstruction is to preserve form and function. Free vascularized bone remains the gold standard for mandibular reconstruction of the anterior defect. While lateral mandibular defects need for vascularized bone remain controversial, free bone flaps provide the most reliable bone stock readily available for dental implantation. Mandibular alignment remains critical for recreating the 3-dimensional relationships of mandibular projection, occlusion, and condylar placement. Depending on the defect, a variety of techniques can be used to maintain mandibular alignment. These include prefabrication of the plate, placement of an internal fixation device, and intermaxillary fixation. Fixation techniques in this day and age generally rely on plates and screws. Miniplates are popular among some reconstructive surgeons while others prefer larger reconstruction plates that can span the entire defect. Bony contouring is critical since keeping bone surfaces in contact allows for improved bone healing. Condylar reconstruction this critical, when the ramus and condylar head are resected, require reconstruction to maintain the entire solid arch. A variety of these techniques are discussed. While the challenge remains reconstituting a solid arch, a variety of techniques can be employed. These techniques including fixation technique, bony contour, mandibular alignment, and condylar reconstruction will be discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J R Haller. 1998. Rigid fixation in mandibular reconstruction.. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1085299

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Stacked plating for metadiaphyseal fractures of the distal radius: a technique report.

Combined injuries of the distal radius and shaft are rare, are usually caused by high energy, and pose a surgical dilemma. Surgical tactics and implants that are routinely used either for isolated fractures of the distal radius or for fractures of the radial shaft are often not applicable for this combined injury. We describe a technique of dual-stacked plating for these metadiaphyseal fractures and its use in two patients.

Bone Plates↗

Plate fixation of olecranon osteotomies.

The management of intra-articular distal humeral fractures remains a difficult surgical problem. Although an olecranon osteotomy provides excellent exposure for management of these fractures, a number of complications can occur after the creation and repair of the osteotomy including nonunion, malunion, hardware failure, and pain secondary to prominent hardware. In an effort to reduce the incidence of these complications, the senior authors now use contoured 3.5 mm reconstruction plates for the fixation of their apex-distal chevron olecranon osteotomies. Two surgeons at a single institution used this technique of exposure on a series of 17 consecutive patients with intra-articular distal humerus fractures between 1996 and 1999. In this series, all osteotomies united. There was one complication related specifically to the osteotomy: one of the screws in the plate penetrated the proximal radioulnar joint, interfering with forearm rotation; a second procedure was required to shorten the screw. Only one of the 17 patients requested plate removal during the 32 month (average) follow-up period. Plate fixation of olecranon osteotomies using a 3.5 mm reconstruction plate provides a construct with predictable healing and few complications. The overall results using this technique are comparable with other reported methods in the literature.

Bone Plates↗