PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10372288

Schizophrenia: improving outcome.

Abstract

Therapeutic advances over the last four decades have enabled most persons with schizophrenia to live in the community. Nevertheless, the majority will continue to experience various symptoms and to have social and cognitive disabilities. With the development of new medications and psychosocial interventions, outpatient status can no longer be viewed as a satisfactory final outcome. This article presents the current state of schizophrenia therapeutics in a variety of clinically relevant situations: first-episode psychosis, treatment-resistant psychosis, chronic, relapsing psychosis, continuous poor functioning, and chronic psychosis not responsive to pharmacotherapy. The first-line atypical antipsychotics should generally be used, mainly because of their comparatively benign side-effect profiles, and they should be given as early as possible in the illness. The clinician should not be quick to accept persistent psychosis; the second-line atypical clozapine should be tried early in the course of the disease in patients showing treatment resistance. For patients residing with their families, educational and supportive family interventions have an important effect on relapse prevention; for those who live on their own and suffer frequent relapses, Assertive Community Treatment may be helpful. Patients with psychosis that is not responsive to pharmacotherapy may benefit from specific modalities of cognitive-behavioral therapy currently being developed, while persons with persistent negative symptoms and limited social competence may find social-skills training useful. In addition, new programs of supported employment may enable some patients to maintain competitive employment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J R Bustillo, J Lauriello, S J Keith. Schizophrenia: improving outcome.. https://doi.org/10.3109/10673229909000335

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Iron regulation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗

The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality. RESULTS: Five of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗