PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10374160

Dodick laser phacolysis: thermal effects.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To gather experimental data on whether Dodick laser phacolysis leads to corneal or scleral burns. SETTING: The Eye Department, County Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria. METHODS: The study was done using a pulsed neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser with a wavelength of 1064 nm; energy, 10 mJ; and duration of pulses, 14 ns. The light pulse is carried by a 400 microns quartz fiber to the laser phacolysis probe. The laser light hits a titanium target inside the tip, causing an optical breakdown and thus a shock wave. The generation of both plasma and the shock disrupt the nuclear material. The temperature at the ultrasonic phaco and laser phacolysis tip was measured under air and balanced salt solution (BSS) in a test chamber and in the anterior chambers of eye-bank eyes. RESULTS: Ultrasonic phacoemulsification led to a difference in temperature up to 55.3 degrees C under air, 12 degrees C in BSS, and 10.9 degrees C in the anterior chamber. There was no clinical significant heat generated by the laser phacolysis tip. CONCLUSION: This initial in vitro study demonstrates that the well-known risk of the tissue heating (i.e., phaco burn) does not occur with Dodick laser phacolysis, even when the irrigation flow is slow or discontinued.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E Alzner, G Grabner. 1999. Dodick laser phacolysis: thermal effects.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00030-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Model of pulsatile-flow of aqueous humor through the iris-lens canal.

PURPOSE: To present a model of pulsatile-flow of aqueous humor from posterior (PC) to anterior chamber (AC) and to analyze the sensitivity of this novel model in detecting typical high risk conditions predisposing to pupillary block. METHODS: The model assumes noncontinuous flow of aqueous through the iris-lens canal. Aqueous that fills the canal will be ejected toward the AC-side of the canal at certain time intervals, and between 2 events of aqueous ejection there is no actual flow through this canal. Pupillary pumping rate (PPR) was calculated from the aqueous flow rate and the calculated volume of iris-lens canal. RESULTS: PPR values were generated by incorporating pupillary diameter (1 to 8 mm), aqueous flow rate (1 to 2.5 microL/min), and iris-lens canal width (0.5 to 2 mm) and height (3-9 microm) in numerical experimentation with the present model. PPR showed inverse dependence on iris-lens canal height and pupillary diameter and was directly proportional to aqueous flow rate, in agreement with the steady-flow model. However, contrary to the steady-flow model, PPR showed inverse dependence on iris-lens canal width and predicted the anticipated PC-AC pressure gradient changes at simulated light-dark transition in eyes of patients with clinically narrow angles and ultrasound biomicroscopy evidenced pupillary block. CONCLUSIONS: Upon the incorporation of real ultrasound biomicroscopy measurements in numerical experimentations with both models, the present pulsatile-flow model, contrary to the steady-flow model, showed good predictability of PC-AC pressure gradient changes in a typical condition predisposing to pupillary block.

Anterior Chamber↗