PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10379979

Computer-assisted spine surgery.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to improve the reliability of pedicle screw insertion. Transpedicle screw insertion may cause neurological, vascular, and mechanical complications. Previous studies of surgical procedures have shown a significant rate of incorrect placement of the screw ranging from 10 to 40%. A new technique that combines preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging with intraoperative passive navigation was used to perform 64 pedicle screw insertions in the thoracolumbar region. At the same time, 64 pedicle screw insertions were performed manually in the same region and on the same vertebral levels. Surgery was followed in all cases by postoperative radiographs and computed tomography examination, which allowed measurements of screw position relative to pedicle position to be performed. A comparison between the two groups showed that six screws in 64 vertebra (9%) had incorrect placement with the computer-assisted technique whereas 28 screws in 64 vertebra (44%) had incorrect placement with manual insertion. The intraoperative accuracy provided by the computer after registration was better than 1 mm. The good results obtained are similar to those reported in the literature. The cortex penetration observed with the computer-assisted technique was not imputed to computer failure. Errors by the surgeon in acquiring data in the pre- and perioperative steps may explain the six incorrect screw placements. This clinical experience confirms that the accuracy and the reliability of this computer-assisted technique are good.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Merloz, J Tonetti, L Pittet, M Coulomb, S Lavallée, J Troccaz, P Cinquin, P Sautot. 1998. Computer-assisted spine surgery.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0150(1998)3%3A6%3C297%3A%3Aaid-igs3%3E3.0.co%3B2-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Three-dimensional computed tomography-based, personalized drill guide for posterior cervical stabilization at C1-C2.

STUDY DESIGN: Cadaver and preliminary clinical study. OBJECTIVES: To enhance the precision of screw positions for posterior transarticular fixations according to Magerl at C1-C2. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The vertebral arteries are at risk during the Magerl operation and may be damaged in up to 4.1% of cases. Even intraoperative navigation, as often used nowadays, does not provide optimal screw positioning in all patients. METHODS: According to the three-dimensional CT data obtained for every individual cadaver or patient, a template was designed for the posterior course of C2: the template contains a drill guide allowing navigated screw positioning inside the left and right isthmus of C2. For a first series of five cadavers a template with clamps connecting only to the lamina of C2, excluding the spinous process from the interface, was carried out. For a second series of three cadavers the template was connected not only to the lamina but also to the spinous process of C2. Both cadaver series were performed without any fluoroscopic control at surgery. Eventually the technology was applied in two clinical cases. RESULTS: The rotational stability of the template toward the lamina C2 was insufficient in the first series, but for the second series both the entry points and screw trajectories were very satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Although the actual experience is limited, the idea of using a template with drill guide might simplify and shorten the surgical act and at the same time enhance the accuracy of C1-C2 transarticular screw positioning.

Bone Screws↗

Computer-assisted thoracic pedicle screw placement: an in vitro feasibility study.

STUDY DESIGN: In this cadaveric study, a computer-assisted image guidance system was tested for accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the system's accuracy for thoracic pedicle screw placement in vitro. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The effective use and reliability of pedicle screw instrumentation in providing short-segment stabilization and correction of deformity is well known in the lumbar spine. Pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine is difficult because of the small dimensions of the thoracic pedicles and risk to the adjacent spinal cord and neurovascular structures. Investigators have shown the improved accuracy of computer-assisted lumbar pedicle screw placement; but the accuracy of computer-assisted thoracic pedicle screw placement, which is becoming more widely used, has not been shown. METHODS: In five human cadavers, 120 thoracic pedicle screws were placed with computer-assisted image guidance. The largest clinically feasible screw was used based on the cross-sectional dimensions of each pedicle. The accuracy was assessed by postoperative computed tomography and visual inspection. RESULTS: The overall pedicle cortex violation was 23 of 120 pedicles (19.2%). Nine violations (7.5%) were graded as major and 14 (11.7%) as minor. A marked and progressive learning curve was evident with the perforation rates that decreased from 37.5% in the first cadaver to 4.2% in the last two cadavers. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate thoracic pedicle screw placement is feasible with computer-assisted surgery. However, as with any other new surgical technology, the learning curve must be recognized and incorporated into the necessary fundamental knowledge and experience for these procedures.

Bone Screws↗