Gene expression systems for lactic acid bacteria.

W M de Vos

doi:10.1016/s1369-5274(99)80050-2

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10383867

Gene expression systems for lactic acid bacteria.

W M de Vos

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Considerable advances have been made in the genetics and molecular biology of lactic acid bacteria, including Lactococcus, Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, Pediococcus and Streptococcus spp. These have resulted in the construction of constitutive gene expression cassettes, inducible gene expression systems, and specific protein targeting systems for these bacteria. These developments are important in the food industry where lactic acid bacteria can be exploited as food-grade cell factories.

Explore related subjects

Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial Lactobacillus Lactococcus Leuconostoc Pediococcus Phylogeny Streptococcaceae Streptococcus Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

W M de Vos. 1999. Gene expression systems for lactic acid bacteria.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-5274(99)80050-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2025

Functional and Pangenomic Exploration of Roc Two-Component Regulatory Systems Identifies Novel Players Across Pseudomonas Species.

The opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa relies on a large collection of two-component regulatory systems (TCSs) to sense and adapt to changing environments. Among them, the Roc (regulation of cup) system is a one-of-a-kind network of branched TCSs, composed of two histidine kinases (HKs-RocS1 and RocS2) interacting with three response regulators (RRs-RocA1, RocR, and RocA2), which regulate virulence, antibiotic resistance, and biofilm formation. Based on extensive work on the Roc system, previous data suggested the existence of other key regulators yet to be discovered. In this work, we identified PA4080, renamed RocA3, as a fourth RR that is activated by RocS1 and RocS2 and that positively controls the expression of the cupB operon. Comparative genomic analysis of the locus identified a gene-rocR3-adjacent to rocA3 in a subpopulation of strains that encodes a protein with structural and functional similarity to the c-di-GMP phosphodiesterase RocR. Furthermore, we identified a fourth branch of the Roc system consisting of the PA2583 HK, renamed RocS4, and the Hpt protein HptA. Using a bacterial two-hybrid system, we showed that RocS4 interacts with HptA, which in turn interacts with RocA1, RocA2, and RocR3. Finally, we mapped the pangenomic RRs repertoire, establishing a comprehensive view of the plasticity of such regulators among clades of the species. Overall, our work provides a comprehensive inter-species definition of the Roc system, nearly doubling the number of proteins known to be involved in this interconnected network of TCSs controlling pathogenicity in Pseudomonas species.

Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial↗

PubMed2025

Remote Regulation by VirB, the Transcriptional Anti-Silencer of Shigella Virulence Genes, Provides Mechanistic Information.

Classical models of bacterial transcription show regulators binding close to promoter elements to exert their effect. However, the scope for long-range regulation exists, especially by nucleoid structuring proteins, like H-NS. Here, long-range regulation by VirB, a transcriptional regulator that alleviates H-NS-mediated silencing of key virulence genes in Shigella species, is explored in vivo to test the limits of long-range regulation and provide further mechanistic insight. VirB-dependent regulation of the well-characterized icsP promoter persists if its cognate site is repositioned 1 kb, 3.3 kb, and even 4.7 kb further upstream than its native position in a plasmid reporter. VirB-dependent regulation diminishes with binding site distance. While increasing cellular VirB pools elevated promoter activity in all constructs with wild-type VirB binding sites, it did not generate a disproportionate increase in promoter activity from remote sites relative to the native site. Since VirB occludes a constitutively active promoter (PT5) when docked adjacent to its -35 element, we next moved the VirB binding site far outside the promoter region. We discovered that VirB still interfered with promoter activity. These findings and those generated from molecular roadblocks engineered around a distally located VirB-binding site are reconciled with the various models of transcriptional regulation by VirB.

Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial↗

PubMed2025

100+ years of phase variation: the premier bacterial bet-hedging phenomenon.

Stochastic, reversible switches in the expression of Salmonella flagella variants were first described by Andrewes in 1922. Termed phase variation (PV), subsequent research found that this phenomenon was widespread among bacterial species and controlled expression of major determinants of bacterial-host interactions. Underlying mechanisms were not discovered until the 1970s/1980s but were found to encompass intrinsic aspects of DNA processes (i.e. DNA slippage and recombination) and DNA modifications (i.e. DNA methylation). Despite this long history, discoveries are ongoing with expansions of the phase-variable repertoire into new organisms and novel insights into the functions of known loci and switching mechanisms. Some of these discoveries are somewhat controversial as the term 'PV' is being applied without addressing key aspects of the phenomenon such as whether mutations or epigenetic changes are reversible and generated prior to selection. Another 'missing' aspect of PV research is the impact of these adaptive switches in real-world situations. This review provides a perspective on the historical timeline of the discovery of PV, the current state-of-the-art, controversial aspects of classifying phase-variable loci and possible 'missing' real-world effects of this phenomenon.

Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial↗