PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 10385576

How many subjects constitute a study?

Abstract

In fMRI there are two classes of inference: one aims to make a comment about the "typical" characteristics of a population, and the other about "average" characteristics. The first pertains to studies of normal subjects that try to identify some qualitative aspect of normal functional anatomy. The second class necessarily applies to clinical neuroscience studies that want to make an inference about quantitative differences of a regionally specific nature. The first class of inferences is adequately serviced by conjunction analyses and fixed-effects models with relatively small numbers of subjects. The second requires random-effect analyses and larger cohorts.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K J Friston, A P Holmes, K J Worsley. 1999. How many subjects constitute a study?. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1999.0439

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) genotype and susceptibility to RT inhibitors during abacavir monotherapy and combination therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in HIV-1 susceptibility (genotype and phenotype) during an initial abacavir monotherapy phase followed by the addition of zidovudine and lamivudine. DESIGN: Sixty HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral therapy-naive subjects were randomized to receive 100, 300 or 600 mg abacavir twice daily. Subjects completing 24 weeks of randomized therapy or meeting a protocol defined switch criterion could switch to open label abacavir/zidovudine/lamivudine. METHODS: Plasma HIV-1 reverse transcriptase was genotyped at baseline, week 12, and at the last time point on ABC monotherapy. Drug susceptibility was analysed at baseline and on subsequent samples with sufficient HIV-1 RNA levels using the recombinant virus assay. Virological responses (week 24) were correlated to week 24 genotypes. RESULTS: Mutant viruses were not detected before week 12 with the exception of one subject. At the latest time point on abacavir monotherapy (range, weeks 6-48), 21 out of 43 subjects harboured virus with resistance conferring mutations including single, double and triple combinations of K65R, L74V, Y115F and M184V. The most common mutational pattern was L74V + M184V (11/21 cases). Twenty of the 21 subjects with isolates containing abacavir-associated mutations reached week 48, and upon addition of lamivudine/zidovudiine, 16 out of 20 (80%) had week 48 plasma HIV-1 -RNA below 400 copies/ml. At week 48, 16 out of 46 genotypes were obtained; one of these was wild-type; 15 contained M184V either alone, in combination with K65R and/or L74V and/or Y115F or with thymidine analogue-associated mutations. Week 48 viral load levels for these 15 subjects was low (median 3.43 log10 copies/ml or -1.99 log10 copies reduction from baseline). Genotype correlated well with phenotypic resistance to ABC; four samples with three abacavir-associated mutations had high level abacavir resistance (> 8-fold) and six samples with two or three mutations showed intermediate (4-8-fold) resistance. All samples with single mutations retained full ABC susceptibility. CONCLUSIONS: Resistance conferring mutations to abacavir were relatively slow to develop during the monotherapy phase, and did not preclude durable efficacy of abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine up to 48 weeks.

Cohort Studies

Effect of interferon beta-1b in MS: assessment of annual accumulation of PD/T2 activity on MRI. UBC MS/MRI Analysis Group and the MS Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the efficacy of interferon beta-1b (IFNbeta-1b) on lesion activity could be shown with annual analysis of MRI. BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes and MRI burden of disease changes in MS patients in a multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled 5-year trial of IFNbeta-1b have been reported, together with an analysis of 6-weekly MRI activity in a small subgroup during 2 years. MRI activity measurements based on annual scans have not been documented. METHODS: Patients were randomized into three treatment arms: placebo, 1.6 mIU, and 8 mIU IFNbeta-1b self-administered subcutaneously every other day. Active lesions were identified as new, enlarging, or recurrent on proton density and T2-weighted MRI scans. Gadolinium was not used. An annual accumulation activity index was developed as an additional analysis of lesion activity. RESULTS: During the 5 years, both high- and low-dose IFNbeta-1b groups showed a striking reduction in lesion annual accumulation activity on the activity index versus placebo (p = 0.001). Thirty-five percent of the high-dose patients and 29% of the low-dose patients were MRI inactive by this method of analysis, whereas only 16% of placebo patients were inactive (p = 0.001, placebo versus 8 mIU). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of the annual accumulation of lesion activity shows that the previously reported treatment effect seen on MRI scanning once every 6 weeks in a subcohort of the patients can also be seen on yearly scans. This annual accumulation activity analysis provides an independent MRI confirmation of a treatment and dose effect for IFNbeta-1b.

Cohort Studies