PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10396451

Do axial dynamic fixators really produce axial dynamization?

Abstract

The use of dynamic external fixators for the treatment of long bone fracture is widespread and well accepted. It is claimed that dynamization, i.e. small micromovements of compression/distraction at the fracture site, can be produced by allowing sliding of an inner rod within an outer housing. However, as the forces on the fixator are not direct but transferred from the bone via bone pins, there is a bending moment on the fixator. This produces "self-locking" and effectively prevents axial movements. We have studied the effect of this moment on the binding properties of the Orthofix system. The amount of movement at a simulated fracture site allowed before this locking occurs was measured and its implications discussed. It would appear that true axial dynamization does not take place using this system.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C B Howard, A Simkin, Y Tiran, S Porat, D Segal, Y Mattan. 1999. Do axial dynamic fixators really produce axial dynamization?. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1383(98)00190-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Safety evaluation of large external fixation clamps and frames in a magnetic resonance environment.

Large orthopedic external fixation clamps and related components were evaluated for force, torque, and heating response when subjected to the strong electromagnetic fields of magnetic-resonance (MR) imaging devices. Forces induced by a 3-Tesla (T) MR scanner were compiled for newly designed nonmagnetic clamps and older clamps that contained ferromagnetic components. Heating trials were performed in a 1.5 and in a 3 T MR scanner with two assembled external fixation frames. Forces of the newly designed clamps were more than a factor 2 lower as the gravitational force on the device whereas, magnetic forces on the older devices showed over 10 times the force induced by earth acceleration of gravity. No torque effects could be found for the newly designed clamps. Temperature measurements at the tips of Schanz screws in the 1.5 T MR scanner showed a rise of 0.7 degrees C for a pelvic frame and of 2.1 degrees C for a diamond knee bridge frame when normalized to a specific absorption rate (SAR) of 2 W/kg. The normalized temperature increases in the 3 T MR scanner were 0.9 degrees C for the pelvic frame and 1.1 degrees C for the knee bridge frame. Large external fixation frames assembled with the newly designed clamps (390 Series Clamps), carbon fiber reinforced rods, and implant quality 316L stainless steel Schanz screws met prevailing force and torque limits when tested in a 3-T field, and demonstrated temperature increase that met IEC-60601 guidelines for extremities. The influence of frame-induced eddy currents on the risk of peripheral nerve stimulation was not investigated.

External Fixators↗