PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10415456

Model of human refractive error development.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To construct a model of refractive error development that can account for the different interactive mechanisms and time courses of refractive error in the hyperope (HYP), emmetrope (EMM), early-onset myope (EOM), and late-onset myope (LOM) over the first 30 years of life. METHODS: First, a baseline short-term (1 mo.) simulation of a previously developed nearwork-induced transient myopia (NITM) model was performed under both far- and near-viewing paradigms to obtain the critical relationships between AErms and refractive error for the four refractive groups. Then, two control pathways were added to the NITM model. The genetically-controlled pathway was associated with the long-term growth of the cornea, lens, and the eyeball. The environmentally-controlled pathway was associated with retinal-defocus during nearwork, wherein the root mean square (rms) of the accommodative error (AE) above a threshold level resulted in an increase in axial length of the eyeball. The thresholds for defocus-induced axial length change were empirically determined to correspond to the differential susceptibility in the four refractive groups. The combination of effects from the two pathways produced the overall refractive error. The relationship between AErms and refractive error was combined with the two control pathways for the long-term simulations (30 yrs: the initial 15 yrs using a far-viewing paradigm followed by an additional 15 yrs using a near-viewing paradigm) to quantify refractive error development as related to daily nearwork activity in the four refractive groups. RESULTS: All refractive groups began early in life with a genetically-determined hyperopic refractive error. The HYP had the lowest susceptibility or highest threshold to retinal defocus effects, and remained at a hyperopic level. The EMM exhibited a relative myopic shift in the first 2 years to become and remain at emmetropia. In the myopic groups, the EOM exhibited both a genetically-controlled component (starting 2 years of age) and a defocus-induced component (starting at 15 years of age), whereas the LOM manifested only a defocus-induced factor (starting at 15 years of age) in the development of myopia. In addition, simulations indicated that emmetropization occurred only for "induced" refractive error that was less than 0.5 D, which was consistent with the non-monotonic relationship between AErms and refractive error, wherein the minimum AErms occurred at 0.5 D. CONCLUSIONS: The model showed that both genetic and defocus-induced environmental factors play important roles in the development of refractive error in the different refractive groups. The model also provides a framework for further detailed quantitative analysis of the processes of refractive error development and emmetropization.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G K Hung, K J Ciuffreda. 1999. Model of human refractive error development.. https://doi.org/10.1076/ceyr.19.1.41.5343

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Conceptual model of human blur perception.

An empirically based, conceptual model of human blur perception is presented. It incorporates the concepts of blur detection and blur discrimination in depth, and across the central and peripheral retina, in two- and three-dimensional visual space. Key aspects of the model are its dynamic nature, predictability regarding the blur-based depth-ordering of objects, patterns of retinal defocus with far and near viewing, and interactions related to retinal defocus between the central and peripheral retina. Furthermore, a two-dimensional schematic representation of the blur-free region during near viewing is depicted in dioptric space. This model has implications with respect to accommodative control, depth perception, and refractive error development and progression.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

The effect of human in vivo accommodation on crystalline lens stability.

AIM: To determine the effect of human in vivo accommodation on the stability of the crystalline lens. METHODS: Using a dual Purkinje image (DPI) eyetracker, the phase-time difference and amplitudes of Purkinje images I (P(I)) and IV (P(1V)) were measured in 37 normal emmetropic subjects (34 women and 3 men; mean age 19.8, range 18-22 years) when they changed focus from 70 to 15 cm and simultaneously rotated their heads horizontally from side to side or made horizontal saccades between two targets 6.8 degrees apart. RESULTS: When the subjects changed focus from 70 to 15 cm and rotated their heads or made eye saccades, the phase-time difference between P(I) and P(IV) decreased. During saccades, the amplitude of both P(I) and P(IV) overshoots significantly increased with focus at 15 cm; however, their ratio (P(IV) overshoot amplitude/P(I) overshoot amplitude) significantly declined. CONCLUSIONS: The lens is stable during accommodation. The implications of these findings on the mechanism of accommodation are discussed.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of an accommodating dual-optic intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Private practice and university centers. METHODS: A prospective noncomparative case series with retrospective control comprised 21 patients (26 eyes) scheduled for small-incision extracapsular cataract extraction by phacoemulsification with implantation of the Synchrony dual-optic accommodating IOL (Visiogen) (accommodating IOL group) and 10 patients who had small-incision extracapsular phacoemulsification with implantation of a monofocal, single-optic IOL at least 6 months previously (control group). Patients were examined 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Defocus curves in the accommodating IOL group were compared with those in the control group. The main outcome measures were postoperative distance uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity; near uncorrected, distance corrected, and near corrected visual acuity; and accommodative range based on defocus curves. RESULTS: Twenty-four eyes were available at the 6-month follow-up visit. All eyes had best corrected distance visual acuity of 20/40 or better, and 19 eyes (79%) had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Uncorrected near visual acuity was 20/40 or better in all eyes. With distance correction, 23 eyes (96%) had an acuity of 20/40 or better at near. Defocus curve analysis suggested a mean accommodative range of 3.22 diopters (D) +/- 0.88 (SD) (range 1.00 to 5.00 D) in the accommodating IOL group and 1.65 +/- 0.58 D in the control group (range 1.00 to 2.50 D) (P<.05). CONCLUSION: The Synchrony dual-optic IOL shows promise as an option to provide accommodative function in pseudophakic patients.

Accommodation, Ocular↗