PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10421008

Towards an analytic framework for the visuospatial domain: spatial reference frames, cognitive operations, and neural systems.

V Jagaroo
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This article addresses the confusion in neuropsychological literature on visuospatial function and then proposes an analytic framework towards resolution in the visuospatial domain. Three bodies of literature on visuospatial processing are summarized, and from each is derived an analytic dimension for visuospatial investigation. They are: (1) the frame of space (e.g., egocentric), (2) the definition of spatial operations in cognitive terms, and (3) spatial processing in terms of neural hierarchy and respective neural centers. It is proposed that these dimensions can constitute a working model to clarify the complexity of visuospatial function.

Explore related subjects

CognitionHumansModels, NeurologicalNerve NetSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V Jagaroo. 1999. Towards an analytic framework for the visuospatial domain: spatial reference frames, cognitive operations, and neural systems.. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.21.1.134.938

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

Reading Chinese characters for meaning: the role of phonological information.

Two experiments with the Stroop paradigm were conducted to investigate the role of phonological codes in access to the meaning of Chinese characters. Subjects named the ink color of viewed characters or color patches. Key items were color characters, their homophones with the same tone, homophones with different tones, and semantic associates. Apart from finding the usual Stroop interference effect, homophones produced significant interference in the incongruent condition, provided that they had the same tone as the color characters. The interference effect from homophones, however, was significantly smaller than that from color characters. Semantic associates generated an interference effect in the incongruent condition, an effect of the same magnitude as the effect from the same-tone homophones. Finally, in the congruent conditions, all the key items yielded facilitations compared to neutral controls, though the facilitation from color characters was larger than the facilitations from other types of characters. These findings suggest that phonological codes in Chinese are activated obligatorily and provide early sources of constraint in access to meaning.

Cognition↗
PubMed2000

Sensory and cognitive contributions of color to the recognition of natural scenes.

Although color plays a prominent part in our subjective experience of the visual world, the evolutionary advantage of color vision is still unclear [1] [2], with most current answers pointing towards specialized uses, for example to detect ripe fruit amongst foliage [3] [4] [5] [6]. We investigated whether color has a more general role in visual recognition by looking at the contribution of color to the encoding and retrieval processes involved in pattern recognition [7] [8] [9]. Recognition accuracy was higher for color images of natural scenes than for luminance-matched black and white images, and color information contributed to both components of the recognition process. Initially, color leads to an image-coding advantage at the very early stages of sensory processing, most probably by easing the image-segmentation task. Later, color leads to an advantage in retrieval, presumably as the result of an enhanced image representation in memory due to the additional attribute. Our results ascribe color vision a general role in the processing of visual form, starting at the very earliest stages of analysis: color helps us to recognize things faster and to remember them better.

Cognition↗
PubMed2000

Linguistic and non-linguistic spatial categorization.

Three experiments examine the relation between linguistic and non-linguistic categorization of spatial relations. We compare linguistic and non-linguistic responses to the same spatial stimuli. Contrary to earlier claims in the literature (Hayward, W. G. & Tarr, M. J. (1995). Spatial language and spatial representation. Cognition, 55, 39-84), we find that linguistic and non-linguistic spatial categories do not correspond. Rather, they appear to have an inverse relation such that the prototypes of linguistic categories, such as 'above', are boundaries in non-linguistic spatial categorization. Evidence for this inverse relation comes from linguistic acceptability judgments and the pattern of bias in participants' reproductions of location. Our findings suggest that while linguistic and non-linguistic spatial organization rely on a common underlying structure, that structure may play different roles in the two organizational systems.

Cognition↗