PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10429846

Prevention and harm reduction for chemical dependency: a process perspective.

Abstract

Clinical psychology is often on the periphery of treatment and prevention efforts to stop substance abuse and dependence. This article describes the current status of prevention research and practice, outlines a process perspective on the initiation and cessation of drug use and abuse, and offers some new ideas about how psychology can and should become involved in the prevention of chemical dependency. Psychologists are faced with the precursors and consequences of chemical dependency on a daily basis. With improved training and increased awareness, and aided by a process perspective, psychology and psychologists can play an important role in preventing the onset of chemical dependency, creating early interventions to stop the process of initiation, and becoming more involved in treatment and harm-reduction efforts. Psychologists have the basic training and the biopsychosocial orientation that could make them effective agents for primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of chemical dependency.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C C DiClemente. 1999. Prevention and harm reduction for chemical dependency: a process perspective.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7358(98)00092-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Implementing emergency research requiring exception from informed consent, community consultation, and public disclosure.

Conducting emergency research in the out-of-hospital and emergency department setting is a challenge because of the inability of patients to provide informed consent in many situations. Federal guidelines allowing research under an exception from informed consent for emergency research have been established (21 CRF 50.24). Community consultation and public disclosure, 2 required components of obtaining this exception, are seen by many as a barrier to resuscitation research. This article will provide a brief overview of the history of the exception from informed consent for emergency research and summarize our methods recently used to successfully complete community consultation and public disclosure for a trial evaluating 2 devices used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a large metropolitan area.

Attitude to Health↗