PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10436126

Stroke mortality in blacks. Disturbing trends.

R F Gillum
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite long-term declines in US stroke mortality rates, declines have slowed in the past decade and targets for blacks for the years 2000 and 2010 seem attainable only by extraordinary measures, if at all. This review focuses attention on key aspects of this problem. Data from the US National Center for Health Statistics and reports of population-based studies of stroke mortality published since 1987 retrieved by computerized literature searches were reviewed. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: The third leading cause of death in black women and the sixth in black men in the United States in 1996, stroke accounted for 10 509 deaths in women and 7972 in men among blacks: 7.92% and 5.33%, respectively, of the total deaths. Age-adjusted death rates per 100 000 were black women, 39.2; white women, 22.9; black men, 50.9; and white men, 26.3. Available data indicate that compared with US whites, US blacks have greater mortality rates for every stroke subtype, with the likely exception of cerebral infarction due to extracranial carotid artery occlusion. These differences will persist into the 21st century. The number of stroke deaths in blacks increased by >8% between 1992 and 1996. CONCLUSIONS: Increased research on stroke in blacks is needed to develop more effective strategies for primary and secondary prevention of stroke to reduce the high burden of premature mortality and morbidity. Renewed efforts to prevent and control stroke risk factors (in particular elevated blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking) are needed among US blacks.

Explore related subjects

Black PeopleCerebrovascular DisordersFemaleHumansMalePopulation SurveillanceRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateUnited StatesWhite PeopleBlack or African AmericanJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R F Gillum. 1999. Stroke mortality in blacks. Disturbing trends.. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.8.1711

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

BiDil for heart failure in black patients: implications of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval.

In 2005, the combination of hydralazine hydrochloride and isosorbide dinitrate was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating heart failure in black patients. In departing from its long history of approving drugs for general clinical indications without regard to demographic classification, the FDA cited the need to address racial disparities in health as an important contributor to their decision. The authors argue that this decision, although perhaps well-intentioned, was based on flawed scientific interpretation of trial results that claimed differential drug response by race and ignored the considerable literature on the cause of racial disparities in health and health care. Because of its potential impact on future drug approvals, the FDA's decision is a setback in the scientific and policy discourse on medical therapeutics and race and specifically hinders the efforts aimed at eliminating health and health care disparities.

Black People↗
PubMed2007

BiDil for heart failure in black patients: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration perspective.

Critics of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the fixed combination of hydralazine hydrochloride, 37.5 mg, and isosorbide dinitrate, 20 mg, for treating heart failure in black patients have suggested that data were insufficient to distinguish treatment effects in black and white people; that distinctions based on race, rather than pathophysiology, were scientifically unreasonable; and that a "race-based" approval could be a commercial ploy to avoid a more expensive and prolonged full evaluation of a drug. The criticisms acknowledge that data supporting the approval came from a well-designed clinical trial in which self-identified black patients with heart failure who took hydralazine hydrochloride-isosorbide dinitrate with standard therapy experienced a statistically significant 43% (95% CI, 11% to 63%) reduction in mortality compared with those who took only the standard therapy. The criticisms do not always recognize that the decision to conduct the trial in only black patients reflected careful analyses of 2 previous trials in racially mixed patient populations that compared hydralazine hydrochloride-isosorbide dinitrate with placebo or with enalapril. Both trials showed little or no overall effect of hydralazine hydrochloride-isosorbide dinitrate in the mostly white patient population but hinted at a substantial effect in subsets of black patients. Perhaps most critically, the criticisms do not appreciate the urgency of strong scientific evidence of a substantial survival benefit in black patients. A serious attempt to avoid race-based approval by mandating study of a mixed population to identify a possible white patient-responder subset, particularly without a plausible hypothesis as to what that subset might be, would have required years of work, many thousands of patients, and wholly unreasonable delay in approval of a treatment whose effectiveness had been well-documented in the group for which it was intended.

Black People↗