PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10440880

Simple methods for checking for possible errors in reported odds ratios, relative risks and confidence intervals.

P N Lee
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Meta-analyses of data from epidemiological studies are often based on odds ratios (ORs) or relative risks (RRs) and their 95 per cent confidence intervals (CIs) as reported by the authors. Where possible ORs, RRs and CIs should be checked against the source data. Some simple methods are presented for checking the validity of reported ORs, RRs and CIs where the source data are not available. These methods include inferring the minimum total number of subjects in the study, the minimum total number of cases and the minimum number there must be in any disease/exposure category. Examples taken from the literature on environmental tobacco smoke exposure (ETS) illustrate that errors in published data are not infrequent and may stay undetected in meta-analyses.

Explore related subjects

Case-Control StudiesChinaCohort StudiesConfidence IntervalsEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleHeart DiseasesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMeta-Analysis as TopicOdds RatioRisk FactorsTobacco Smoke PollutionUnited StatesJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P N Lee. 1999-08-15. Simple methods for checking for possible errors in reported odds ratios, relative risks and confidence intervals.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990815)18%3A15%3C1973%3A%3Aaid-sim166%3E3.0.co%3B2-g

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

The future of genetic case-control studies.

The case-control study design has been a veritable workhorse in epidemiological research since its inception and acceptance as a valid and valued field of inquiry. The reasons for this owe to the simplicity of the required sampling and the (potential) ease of analysis and interpretation of results. Unfortunately, there are a number of problems that plague the use of the case-control design in assessing relationships between genetic variation and disease susceptibility in the population at large. Many of these problems are entirely analogous to problems that inhere in applications of the case-control design in nongenetic settings. These problems include stratification, the assessment of statistical significance, heterogeneity, and the interpretation of multiple outcomes or phenotypic information. In this chapter we describe 10 problems thought to plague genetic case-control studies and offer potential solutions to each. Many of our proposed solutions require the use of multiple DNA markers to accommodate the genetic background of the individuals sampled as cases and controls. It is hoped that our discussions and proposals will spark further debate about the analysis and ultimate utility of the case-control study in genetic epidemiology research.

Case-Control Studies↗
PubMed2001

Optimum study designs.

Because simplistic designs will lead to prohibitively large sample sizes, the optimization of genetic study designs is critical for successfully mapping genes for complex diseases. Creative designs are necessary for detecting and amplifying the usually weak signals for complex traits. Two important outcomes of a study design--power and resolution--are implicitly tied together by the principle of uncertainty. Overemphasis on either one may lead to suboptimal designs. To achieve optimality for a particular study, therefore, practical measures such as cost-effectiveness must be used to strike a balance between power and resolution. In this light, the myriad of factors involved in study design can be checked for their effects on the ultimate outcomes, and the popular existing designs can be sorted into building blocks that may be useful for particular situations. It is hoped that imaginative construction of novel designs using such building blocks will lead to enhanced efficiency in finding genes for complex human traits.

Case-Control Studies↗