PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10449450

PCR-Based methods for genotyping viridans group streptococci.

Abstract

Standard repetitive extragenic palindromic (REP)-PCR, enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-PCR, and Salmonella enteritidis repetitive element-PCR methods for bacterial strain typing were performed with DNA extracted by boiling members of each of the currently recognized species of human viridans group streptococci. Each of the methods was reproducible. The unique isolates (n = 72) from 15 species of viridans group streptococci were readily distinguishable, with no two isolates showing greater than 90% per cent similarity. The majority of strains exhibited much less than 90% similarity. Isolates identical by REP-PCR were also identical by the other two methods. These PCR-based typing methods, although they do not permit determination of the species of the isolates, are simple to perform and are suitable for clinical and ecological investigations of viridans group streptococci.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Alam, S R Brailsford, R A Whiley, D Beighton. 1999. PCR-Based methods for genotyping viridans group streptococci.. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.37.9.2772-2776.1999

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of methods for analysis of selective genotyping survival data.

Survival traits and selective genotyping datasets are typically not normally distributed, thus common models used to identify QTL may not be statistically appropriate for their analysis. The objective of the present study was to compare models for identification of QTL associated with survival traits, in particular when combined with selective genotyping. Data were simulated to model the survival distribution of a population of chickens challenged with Marek disease virus. Cox proportional hazards (CPH), linear regression (LR), and Weibull models were compared for their appropriateness to analyze the data, ability to identify associations of marker alleles with survival, and estimation of effects when all individuals were genotyped (full genotyping) and when selective genotyping was used. Little difference in power was found between the CPH and the LR model for low censoring cases for both full and selective genotyping. The simulated data were not transformed to follow a Weibull distribution and, as a result, the Weibull model generally resulted in less power than the other two models and overestimated effects. Effect estimates from LR and CPH were unbiased when all individuals were genotyped, but overestimated when selective genotyping was used. Thus, LR is preferred for analyzing survival data when the amount of censoring is low because of ease of implementation and interpretation. Including phenotypic data of non-genotyped individuals in selective genotyping analysis increased power, but resulted in LR having an inflated false positive rate, and therefore the CPH model is preferred for this scenario, although transformation of the data may also make the Weibull model appropriate for this case. The results from the research presented herein are directly applicable to interval mapping analyses.

Genotype↗