PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10449817

Pancreatic biopsy: why? When? How?

Abstract

For final diagnosis of pancreatic cancer histologic or cytologic confirmation is needed. Tissue or cell material can be achieved by percutaneous puncture as part of the preoperative workup. During operation core-needle, incisional, and wedge biopsies or fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) can be chosen. Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy are high for both histologic and cytologic examinations, and false-positive results are exceptional, giving a specificity of 100% in most published series. The complication rate is low, also for knife biopsies in recent reports, provided biopsy of seemingly normal tissue is avoided. Percutaneous puncture is currently restricted to patients found to have advanced disease and who are not candidates for laparotomy. Microscopic confirmation is required in all patients in whom chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both are planned. However, for attempted radical surgery per se, biopsy is not mandatory if the clinical suspicion of cancer is high and the surgical team has documented low postoperative mortality and morbidity rates.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Ihse, J Axelson, S Dawiskiba, L Hansson. 1999. Pancreatic biopsy: why? When? How?. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689900596

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗