PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10452931

Issues in cytologic screening and evaluation.

D D Davey
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A variety of cytologic specimens may be useful in the screening and evaluation of patients for neoplastic processes. Fine needle aspiration cytology is an example of a cost-effective procedure for mass lesions and may provide a definitive diagnosis for treatment purposes. The sensitivity of a single cytologic procedure varies from 70% to more than 90% depending on specimen type and procurement methods. Communication with the laboratory, including provision of clinical information, is important to ensure proper specimen submission and handling and will also clarify cytologic terminology and appropriate follow-up measures.

Explore related subjects

Biopsy, NeedleCommunicationCost-Benefit AnalysisCytodiagnosisFollow-Up StudiesHumansInterprofessional RelationsLaboratoriesMass ScreeningNeoplasmsSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingTerminology as TopicJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D D Davey. 1999. Issues in cytologic screening and evaluation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10452931/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗