PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10461704

Hypercalcemia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide a review of hypercalcemia of malignancy, including the incidence, pathophysiology, signs and symptoms, treatment, and nursing interventions. DATA SOURCES: Research studies, review articles, proceedings from nursing conferences, and book chapters. CONCLUSIONS: Hypercalcemia of malignancy is difficult to diagnose because the signs and symptoms are similar to those experienced by patients with end-stage cancers. Knowing the cancers and histologic cell types that are at high risk for hypercalcemia assists in early diagnosis and treatment. Treatment decisions must consider potential benefits and their risks and affect on quality of life. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Hypercalcemia of malignancy as a metabolic oncologic emergency requires accurate assessment and rapid intervention. Early recognition by the patient, family, and health care professionals can result in improved quality of life.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M L Barnett. 1999. Hypercalcemia.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-2081(99)80007-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Solitary plasmacytoma of bone and asymptomatic multiple myeloma.

Most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) present with symptoms, have evidence of generalized disease, and require chemotherapy promptly to reduce the malignant clone. Some patients present with a local symptom from a single plasmacytoma but no myeloma elsewhere. Such patients usually become free of symptoms after local radiotherapy. In patients with MM without symptoms, the diagnosis is made on the basis of screening laboratory tests. In patients with either solitary plasmacytoma of bone or asymptomatic MM, systemic treatment should be deferred until there is evidence of disease progression.

Bone Neoplasms↗

pRB and p107 have distinct effects when expressed in pRB-deficient tumor cells at physiologically relevant levels.

A key difference among the three structurally similar pRB family members is that only pRB is a tumor suppressor. Identification of distinctive functional differences between pRB and p107/p130 therefore holds promise for a better understanding of the tumor suppression mechanisms of pRB. Enigmatically, pRB and p107 have been shown to have indistinguishable growth suppression activities when studied in the pRB-deficient Saos-2 cell system. In this study, we discovered that, when expressed at physiologically relevant levels, pRB and p107 had distinctive effects in causing growth suppression. pRB induced cellular p130 levels while p107 repressed them. p107, but not pRB, blocked cells inside S phase in addition to G1 arrest. In contrast, no qualitative differences were identified in their abilities to repress the expression of a set of suspected pRB/E2F repression target genes. These results indicate that pRB and p107 possess different growth suppression effects, despite the fact that they have similar E2F repression effects.

Bone Neoplasms↗