PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10462601

Enhanced Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction for Prostate-specific Antigen Combined With Needle Biopsy Results: A Superior Predictor of pT3 Disease.

Abstract

Background: Preoperative staging for prostate cancer underestimates the final pathology stage in approximately 40-50% of the cases. Previous work from our institution demonstrated that an enhanced reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) enabled more accurate staging of presumably localized prostate cancer. The goal of the current study is to determine if needle biopsy results when combined with the RT-PCR for PSA assay are a better predictor of final pathology stage. Methods and Results: One hundred sixty-two men with needle biopsy-diagnosed prostate cancer had blood drawn for the RT-PCR for PSA assay before undergoing radical prostatectomy. Polymerase chain reaction primers specific for the PSA gene were run, along with appropriate controls. Tumor was characterized using the TMN staging system: organ confined (pT2a-c), capsular penetration (pT2a-b), seminal vesicle involvement (pT3c). Surgical margins and lymph nodes were also evaluated. Of the 162 patients, the majority had localized disease by digital rectal examination: T2 = 97%, and T3 = 3%. On needle biopsy, 48 cases (30%) had a Gleason score >/=7 and 35 cases (22%) had perineural involvement (PNI). The RT-PCR for PSA assay was positive in 50 patients (31%). Final pathology revealed 39% of patients had pT3 disease; none of the 162 patients had lymph node involvement. Statistical analysis revealed that a Gleason score >/=7 had 81% specificity and 46% sensitivity in predicting pT3 disease (odds ratio 3.6). The presence of PNI on needle biopsy was 89% specific and 38% sensitive in predicting pT3 disease (odds ratio, 4.9). The RT-PCR for PSA assay was 89% specific and 62% sensitive in predicting pT3 disease (odds ratio, 13.0). All 14 cases with both RT-PCR for PSA and PNI positivity had pT3 disease. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated the independent predictive strength of PNI on needle biopsy, Gleason score >/=7, and RT-PCR for PSA positivity for identifying pT3 disease; their combined odds ratio was more than 180. Conclusions: Using the RT-PCR for PSA assay in conjunction with needle biopsy results increases the predictive strength for pT3 disease in patients with presumed organ-confined prostate carcinoma.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

MA Rubin, M Fang, MD Stifelman, VRIES De, R Buttyan, MC Benson, AE Katz, CA Olsson, K O'Toole. 1997. Enhanced Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction for Prostate-specific Antigen Combined With Needle Biopsy Results: A Superior Predictor of pT3 Disease.. https://doi.org/10.1054/modi00200135

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗