PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10463128

Nonactive antenna compensation for fixed-array microwave imaging--Part I: Model development.

Abstract

Fixed-array microwave imaging with multisensor data acquisition can suffer from nonactive antenna element interactions which cause distortions in the measurements. In Part I of a two-part paper, we develop a nonactive antenna compensation model for incorporation in model-based near-field microwave image reconstruction methods. The model treats the nonactive members of the antenna array as impedance boundary conditions applied over a cylindrical surface of finite radius providing two parameters, the effective antenna radius and impedance factor, which can be determined empirically from measured data. Results show that the effective radius and impedance factor provide improved fits to experimental data in homogeneous phantoms where measurements are obtained with and without the presence of the nonactive antenna elements. Once deduced, these parameters are incorporated into the nonactive antenna compensation model and lead to systematic data-model match improvements in heterogeneous phantoms. While the improvements afforded by the nonactive antenna model are small on a per measurement basis, they are not insignificant. As shown in Part II, inclusion of this new model for nonactive antenna compensation produces significantly higher quality image reconstructions from measurements obtained with a fixed-array data acquisition system over the frequency band 500-900 MHz.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K D Paulsen, P M Meaney. 1999. Nonactive antenna compensation for fixed-array microwave imaging--Part I: Model development.. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.781015

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hypothesis testing III: counts and medians.

Radiology research involves comparisons that deal with the presence or absence of various imaging signs and the accuracy of a diagnosis. In this article, the authors describe the statistical tests that should be used when the data are not distributed normally or when they are categorical variables. These nonparametric tests are used to analyze a 2 x 2 contingency table of categorical data. The tests include the chi2 test, Fisher exact test, and McNemar test. When the data are continuous, different nonparametric tests are used to compare paired samples, such as the Mann-Whitney U test (equivalent to the Wilcoxon rank sum test), the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and the sign test. These nonparametric tests are considered alternatives to the parametric t tests, especially in circumstances in which the assumptions of t tests are not valid. For radiologists to properly weigh the evidence in the literature, they must have a basic understanding of the purpose, assumptions, and limitations of each of these statistical tests.

Diagnostic Imaging↗

Characterizing individual scattering events by measuring the amplitude and phase of the electric field diffusing through a random medium.

We describe observations of the amplitude and phase of an electric field diffusing through a three-dimensional random medium, using terahertz time-domain spectroscopy. These measurements are spatially resolved with a resolution smaller than the speckle spot size and temporally resolved with a resolution better than one optical cycle. By computing correlation functions between fields measured at different positions and with different temporal delays, it is possible to obtain information about individual scattering events experienced by the diffusing field. This represents a new method for characterizing a multiply scattered wave.

Diagnostic Imaging↗

Modelling the elastic scattering in diagnostic radiology: the importance of structure form factors.

The importance of structure form factors in describing elastic scattering in diagnostic radiology was studied through a Monte Carlo code built to reproduce scattering in large water samples. The code, developed by us, considers all relevant interactions, including multiple scattering and interference due to scattering by the liquid structure. Geometrical conditions and energies similar to those found in radiology were used. The secondary to primary radiation ratio using the usual free atom approximation and the structure form factor was obtained and both approaches were compared. Calculations of radiological parameters such as the angular distribution of photons incident on the detector and the fraction of scattered photons stopped by anti-scattering grids were also performed considering mammography, thorax and abdomen radiography conditions. The results have shown that S(beta)/P depends on the experimental set-up, being more important for low momentum transfers and sample sizes for which the multiple scattering is not expected to be significant, as in the case of mammography. It was also verified that large samples increase the probability of multiple scattering, masking the structure peak in S(beta) and making the sample structure important just for relatively thin samples. Considering mammography-like geometry, the maximum of the S(beta)/P distribution considering structure form factors occurs around 15 degrees while the correspondent maximum without considering the structure factors occurs around 10 degrees for any sample thickness. S(beta)/P is almost independent of the irradiation field, with the maximum remaining at 15 degrees and 10 degrees for the SFF and FAFF, respectively. The cases studied in this paper stress some conditions in which it is mandatory to use SFF, but since it requires no further significant efforts, the SFF approach is recommended as a standard procedure when describing the elastic scattering process in radiology.

Diagnostic Imaging↗