PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10467389

MRI in multiple sclerosis: correlation with expanded disability status scale (EDSS).

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is very sensitive in showing disseminated MS lesions. Subclinical MR progression occurs frequently, explaining why MR is now used to monitor treatment, even without measurable consequences, of new MR lesions to the patient at this moment. In the light of this clinico-radiological paradox, the significance of MR in MS is discussed, particularly in relation with the expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Gadolinium-enhancing lesions correlate with the occurrence of relapses, CSF myelin breakdown products and, in patients with relapsing-remitting disease, with higher EDSS. However, the predictive value of the frequency of enhancement for changes in EDSS is only weak. For conventional T2-weighted MR imaging, the cross-sectional correlation with EDSS varies between 0.15 and 0.60, and is limited mainly by the inherent lack of tissues specificity of T2-weighted images. Both T1 black holes and magnetisation transfer (MT) parameters show a better correlation with EDSS; it should be noted that lesions in which those abnormalities are found go through an initial phase of enhancement as well. For T1 black holes, a correlation up to 0.81 has been reported for SP patients. Post-mortem studies show that black holes and low MT ratios are in vivo markers of axonal loss. Preliminary data indicate that progressive atrophy also correlates with progression on the EDSS scale. More should be learned about the fate of new MR lesion with regards to development of axonal loss, which at present is difficult to predict in the enhancing stage. The existence of escape mechanisms, including remyelination, make a simple correlation with EDSS extremely unlikely, and perhaps not even desirable. Nevertheless, while the clinical effect of a given new lesion may be difficult to ascertain, the absence of (new) MR lesions is prognostically favourable, as will be the degree to which new lesions are prevented by treatment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Barkhof. 1999. MRI in multiple sclerosis: correlation with expanded disability status scale (EDSS).. https://doi.org/10.1177/135245859900500415

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Type, severity, frequency and management of adverse reactions associated with ultrasound contrast agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis are aimed at evaluating the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) following administration of clinically approved ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) in adults and children, to assess risks in patients with cardiovascular disease and in pregnancy, and to evaluate the effectiveness of emergency management of severe ADRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PRISMA 2020 systematic review was conducted searching PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed quality. Incidence estimates were pooled when feasible, stratified by age group, contrast agent, and administration route. RESULTS: Seventy-four studies encompassing >&#x2009;1 million adults and >&#x2009;36,000 children were included, contributing multiple analytic cohorts to the quantitative synthesis. Severe acute ADRs were extremely rare (6 and 16 cases per 100,000 in adults and children, respectively) and absent following endocavitary administration in children. Non-severe acute ADRs occurred in 11 and 8 cases per 10,000 adults and children, respectively. Delayed reactions were very rare (<&#x2009;1 case per million in adults). No significant safety differences emerged between UCA products. The incidence of ADRs in patients with cardiovascular disease was analogous to the general population. No ADRs were reported in pregnant women. Standard emergency management was effective in almost all serious cases, though rare fatalities occurred. CONCLUSION: UCAs show an excellent safety profile in adults and children, with very rare severe ADRs and few non-severe, typically self-limiting reactions. Strict adherence to recommended emergency management protocols mitigates the remaining risks, supporting safe use across a broad range of clinical indications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42023432668. KEY POINTS: Question What is the incidence, type, and severity of acute and delayed ADRs associated with clinically approved UCAs across different patient populations? Findings Severe acute adverse reactions are very rare, and non-severe reactions are rare and self-limiting, with no significant safety differences between adults, children, or patients with cardiovascular disease. Clinical relevant UCAs show an excellent safety profile across populations. These findings support their safe clinical use as reliable alternatives to iodine-based and gadolinium-based contrast agents in routine diagnostic imaging.

Contrast Media↗

Evaluation of conflicting literature and application to formulary decisions.

PURPOSE: Guidelines were developed for grading the quality, quantity, and consistency of drug literature in support of formulary recommendations. METHODS: Four developmental steps were taken to create a comprehensive literature evaluation system. The first step identified the attributes of a body of literature that were most reflective of its applicability to patient care. The next step defined each domain (quality, quantity, consistency), as determined by the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), in terms of the specific qualities to be assessed; a value was assigned to those qualities. Also, a literature search was conducted to identify strategies for evaluating bodies of literature employed in published assessment tools. Following the analysis of previously published systems, which were evaluated with respect to their inclusion of the AHRQ-identified domains, the next step was the development of specific domains and definitions to get a composite grade (with "better" evidence earning more points) for formulary recommendations. The final step was the creation of a system that aggregated the final score for the recommendation. The recommendation was categorized according to quality, quantity, and consistency of supporting evidence, and the total number of points was calculated and the recommendation given letter and numerical grades. RESULTS: The guidelines that were developed allow the user to accurately, consistently, and easily determine the strength of recommendations for a body of literature that may be conflicting. The addition of criteria for quantity and consistency to previously-published grading systems has made the guidelines more objective. CONCLUSION: A system that accounts for the quality, quantity, and consistency of drug literature was developed to assist in making formulary decisions.

Contrast Media↗

Staging of carcinoma of the uterine cervix and endometrium.

Carcinoma of the uterine cervix and endometrium are common gynecologic malignancies. Both carcinomas are staged and managed by means of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. In uterine cervical cancer, the FIGO staging system is determined preoperatively by limited conventional procedures. Although this system is effective for early stage disease, it has inherent inaccuracies in advanced stage diseases and does not address nodal involvement. CT and MR imaging are widely used as comprehensive imaging modalities to evaluate tumor size and extent, and nodal involvement. MR imaging is an excellent modality for depicting invasive cervical carcinoma and can provide objective measurement of tumor volume, and provides high negative predictive value for parametrial invasion and stage IVA disease. In contrast, endometrial cancer is surgically staged. Beside recognition of the important prognostic factors, including histologic subtype and grade, accurate assessment of the tumor extent on preoperative MR imaging is expected to greatly optimize surgical procedure and therapeutic strategy. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging can offer "one stop" examination for evaluating the depth of myometrial invasion cervical invasion and nodal metastases. Evaluation of myometrial invasion on MR imaging may be an alternative to gross inspection of the uterus during the surgery.

Contrast Media↗