PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10467691

[In Process Citation]

Abstract

GnRH agonist (GnRHa) administered for 6 months leads to an effective desensitisation of the pituitary and hypoestrogenism without exerting a particular effect on the whole metabolism. At the end of the first month's a suppression of the serum estradiol levels are achieved, the level of LH and FSH decline in the hypogonadotropic range. No negative influence on the lipid metabolism after administration of GnRH agonist has been observed. The balance of HDL/LDL does not change during the treatment. There were neither any negative changes in the liver metabolism, kidney function nor in the electrolyte values. In anaemic premenopausal women, for example due to serious menstrual problems, a normalisation of the haemoglobin concentration is obtainable already after a 12-week treatment. With regard to the hemostatis system a significant reduction of the procoagulant activity, fibrin turnover rate and a significant improvement of fibrinolytic activity can be observed under a GnRHa therapy. Although the use of GnRHa leads without doubt to a drastic reduction in the uterus blood flow there are no signs that this also leads to a change in the cerebral arteries blood flow. Menstrual bleeding occurs on average 3 months after the last injection of an GnRHa depot injection; with daily injection or nasal spray 3 to 4 weeks earlier. Theoretical considerations as well as the world-wide use as part of the infertility treatment--in some countries more than 90% of all IVF-cycles are performed using GnRH--,contradict the fact that GnRHa cause a teratogenic effect. Domineering undesirable side-effects during a treatment with GnRH can be traced back almost exclusively to the effective hormonal deprivation. In this context it is remarkable which percentage patients complain about trouble of this spectrum before GnRHa treatment is initiated. The chronicle reduction of the sexual hormone level leads without a doubt to a reduction of bone mineral density. The clinical relevance is furthermore a matter of controversial discussion. Prevention measures can be undertaken through an add-back therapy. This can also be of help in the case of vegetative side-effects caused by a decrease in sexual hormones. The question arises to what extent effective non hormonal add-back therapies are at disposal in the treatment of sexual hormone related malignant tumours. Also men with testosterone deprivation can suffer from distinctive hot flushes, sleeping disturbances and depression which requires some kind of relief in order to maintain an acceptable quality of life.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Buhler. 1999. [In Process Citation]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10467691/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗