PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10475395

Using database information in your clinical practice.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical database information is in wide demand, but it is not always used to its full potential. Clinicians must learn to be the experts and to assert leadership in the use of their own data. METHODS: Clinical databases provide unique perspectives on the full process of care for a heterogeneous population of patients. They focus beyond individual providers, to their interaction within a complex system of care. Exploring questions that arise from this data can identify system issues, which are invisible to individual practitioners or specialties using other traditional review methods. RESULTS: Clinical database information helped our hospital staff identify problems in their approach to a small subset of high risk coronary bypass patients. Multiple system changes resulted in a dramatic reduction in mortality. Collateral impact on all care reduced overall mortality from 4.5% to below 2%. CONCLUSIONS: The greatest opportunities for improvement in patient care often lie in the areas where specialties or teams interface, eg, in overlapping or transferring care. The whole system of care for each patient must be optimized, not just the individual specialty components. Clinical database information provides a way to evaluate and improve the overall process and results of the broader system of patient care.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S W Dziuban. 1999. Using database information in your clinical practice.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00504-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Prediction of long-term prognosis in 12 169 men referred for cardiac rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Predicting the risk of cardiac and all-cause death in patients with established coronary heart disease is important in counseling the individual and designing risk-stratified rehabilitation and secondary prevention programs. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were thus completed on initial assessment data obtained from patients referred to an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation center. METHODS AND RESULTS: A single-center prospective observational design took peak cardiorespiratory exercise test data for 12 169 male rehabilitation candidates aged 55.0+/-9.6 years (7096 myocardial infarctions [MIs], 3077 coronary artery bypass grafts [CABGs], and 1996 documented cases of ischemic heart disease [IHD]). A follow-up of 4 to 29 years (median, 7.9) yielded 107 698 man-years of experience. Entry data were tested for associations with time to cardiac and all-cause death. We recorded 1336 cardiac deaths (953 MI, 225 CABG, and 158 IHD) and 2352 all-cause deaths. A powerful predictor of cardiac and all-cause mortality was measured peak oxygen intake (VO2peak). For the overall sample, values of <15, 15 to 22, and >22 mL/kg per minute yielded respective multivariate adjusted hazard ratios of 1.00, 0.62, and 0.39 for cardiac and 1.00, 0.66, and 0.45 for all-cause deaths. For the separate diagnostic categories, apart from VO2peak, the only other significant predictors of cardiac death common to all 3 were smoking and digoxin, and for all-cause death, age, smoking, digoxin, and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise capacity, as determined by direct measurement of VO2peak, exerts a major long-term influence on prognosis in men after MI, CABG, or IHD and can play a valuable role in risk stratification and counseling.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗