PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10489505

Trauma scoring in a developing country.

S Talwar·S Jain·R Porwal·B L Laddha·P Prasad
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

AIM OF STUDY: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of trauma scoring systems in a developing country. METHOD: Trauma Score (TS) and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) were used to predict the survival of 462 trauma patients during the period January 1996 to July 1996. RESULTS: TS had a sensitivity of 53.9% and a specificity of 98.8% whereas TRISS had a sensitivity of 46% and a specificity of 98.7%. Significant differences in mortality were observed compared with the baseline Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS) norms (Z = 4.17, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Present injury severity instruments using MTOS coefficients do not accurately predict survival of trauma patients in a developing country, thus highlighting the need for developing new coefficients for trauma scoring in these countries.

Explore related subjects

Developing CountriesHumansIndiaPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisSensitivity and SpecificitySurvivalTrauma Severity IndicesTriageJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Talwar, S Jain, R Porwal, B L Laddha, P Prasad. 1999. Trauma scoring in a developing country.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10489505/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Costs of surgeries in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Surgical care is essential for achieving global health equity, yet low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face major gaps in access and planning, partly due to limited evidence on the costs and resource requirements of surgical interventions. Understanding these costs is vital for designing efficient and equitable health systems. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review (covering MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, EconLit and grey literature) to identify studies reporting the costs of surgeries in LMICs from January 2000 to June 2023. Minor and major surgical procedures were considered, focusing on therapeutic procedures (excluding diagnostic interventions). Studies that clearly identified, quantified and costed hospital resources and services deployed in the provision of surgical care, and included at least two of the surgical production factors (ie, consumables, diagnostics, personnel, infrastructure and overhead) in the costing were included. Costs were standardised to 2023 International dollars (I$) for comparability. RESULTS: A total of 74 studies from 29 countries met the inclusion criteria, with 210 cost estimates across 65 procedure groups. Costs varied widely: from I$1.54 for a caesarean section in Tanzania to I$618 098 for paediatric cataract surgery in Zambia. Full costing studies reported higher estimates than partial costing studies. Most studies (60%) originated from upper-middle-income countries, with limited data (10%) from low-income settings. CONCLUSION: This review provides a reference list of surgical procedure costs across LMICs, highlighting considerable cost variation by procedure, specialty and country. The findings underscore the need for better-quality, standardised cost data-especially from low-income countries-to inform national surgical plans, universal health coverage benefit packages and reimbursement policies.

Developing Countries↗