PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10491663

The administrative support team: specialized support.

D B Leitch
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Specialization has enabled one person to develop a high level of expertise in one management function. The entire department of nursing, not just one unit, shares the benefits of this expertise. The result is efficient and effective use of resources. The lateral relationship between the administrative support team and clinical manager teams has promoted communication flow and exchange while keeping the decision-making power at the clinical level. The implementation of the administrative support team has provided the right solution to the problem: specialized support.

Explore related subjects

AlbertaHospital UnitsHumansModels, OrganizationalNurse AdministratorsNursing Service, HospitalOrganizational InnovationOrganizational ObjectivesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D B Leitch. 1999. The administrative support team: specialized support.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-199909000-00004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

A randomized trial of the effect of community pharmacist intervention on cholesterol risk management: the Study of Cardiovascular Risk Intervention by Pharmacists (SCRIP).

BACKGROUND: Despite clear evidence for the efficacy of lowering cholesterol levels, there is a deficiency in its real-world application. There is a need to explore alternative strategies to address this important public health problem. This study aimed to determine the effect of a program of community pharmacist intervention on the process of cholesterol risk management in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial conducted in 54 community pharmacies (1998-2000) included patients at high risk for cardiovascular events (with atherosclerotic disease or diabetes mellitus with another risk factor). Patients randomized to pharmacist intervention received education and a brochure on risk factors, point-of-care cholesterol measurement, referral to their physician, and regular follow-up for 16 weeks. Pharmacists faxed a simple form to the primary care physician identifying risk factors and any suggestions. Usual care patients received the same brochure and general advice only, with minimal follow-up. The primary end point was a composite of performance of a fasting cholesterol panel by the physician or addition or increase in dose of cholesterol-lowering medication. RESULTS: The external monitoring committee recommended early study termination owing to benefit. Of the 675 patients enrolled, approximately 40% were women, and the average age was 64 years. The primary end point was reached in 57% of intervention patients vs 31% in usual care (odds ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-4.1; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: A community-based intervention program improved the process of cholesterol management in high-risk patients. This program demonstrates the value of community pharmacists working in collaboration with patients and physicians.

Alberta↗
PubMed2002

Sex differences in access to coronary revascularization after cardiac catheterization: importance of detailed clinical data.

BACKGROUND: Although some studies suggest that access to cardiac procedures may differ by sex, others have found no evidence of gender bias in cardiac care. OBJECTIVE: To study rates of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in men and women after cardiac catheterization. DESIGN: Cohort study with prospective data collection. SETTING: Alberta, Canada. PATIENTS: Persons undergoing cardiac catheterization between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 1998 (n = 21 816). MEASUREMENTS: The occurrence of revascularization procedures (PCI or CABG) in the year after cardiac catheterization was measured. Unadjusted revascularization rates, partially adjusted rates (adjusted for clinical variables available in most databases, including administrative databases), and fully adjusted rates (additionally adjusted for extent of coronary artery disease and ejection fraction) were also evaluated. RESULTS: The unadjusted relative risk was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.71) for the end point of any revascularization in women relative to men. The relative risk increased to 0.69 (CI, 0.66 to 0.72) with partial adjustment and to 0.98 (CI, 0.94 to 1.03) with full adjustment, indicating equivalent access to revascularization for men and women. For PCI, the corresponding relative risks were 0.77 (CI, 0.73 to 0.82), 0.84 (CI, 0.80 to 0.89), and 1.02 (CI, 0.96 to 1.08). For CABG surgery, the relative risks were 0.54 (CI, 0.51 to 0.58), 0.51 (CI, 0.48 to 0.55), and 0.93 (CI, 0.87 to 1.01). CONCLUSIONS: In Alberta, Canada, clinical variables fully explain sex differences in rates of revascularization after cardiac catheterization, and misleading conclusions would arise without full adjustment for clinical differences between men and women. Extreme caution is needed in interpreting reports on access to care that use sparsely detailed clinical data sources.

Alberta↗