PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10495460

Randomization-based methods for correcting for treatment changes: examples from the Concorde trial.

I R White·A G Babiker·S Walker·J H Darbyshire
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We develop analysis methods for clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes which correct for treatment changes during follow-up, yet are based on comparisons of randomized groups and not of selected groups. A causal model relating observed event times to event times that would have been observed under other treatment scenarios is fitted using the semi-parametric approach of Robins and Tsiatis (avoiding assumptions about the relationship between treatment changes and prognosis). The methods are applied to the Concorde trial of immediate versus deferred zidovudine, to investigate how the results would have differed if no participant randomized to deferred zidovudine had started treatment before reaching ARC or AIDS. We consider issues relating to model choice, non-constant treatment effects and censoring.

Explore related subjects

Anti-HIV AgentsData Interpretation, StatisticalDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleHIV InfectionsHumansModels, StatisticalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignZidovudineJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I R White, A G Babiker, S Walker, J H Darbyshire. 1999-10-15. Randomization-based methods for correcting for treatment changes: examples from the Concorde trial.. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19991015)18%3A19%3C2617%3A%3Aaid-sim187%3E3.0.co%3B2-e

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2021

Drug resistance mutations in HIV provirus are associated with defective proviral genomes with hypermutation.

BACKGROUND: HIV proviral sequencing overcomes the limit of plasma viral load requirement by detecting all the 'archived mutations', but the clinical relevance remains to be evaluated. METHODS: We included 25 participants with available proviral sequences (both intact and defective sequences available) and utilized the genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) to evaluate the level of resistance in their provirus and plasma virus. Defective sequences were further categorized as sequences with and without hypermutations. Personalized GSS score and total GSS score were calculated to evaluate the level of resistance to a whole panel of antiretroviral therapies and to certain antiretroviral therapy that a participant was using. The rate of sequences with drug resistance mutations (DRMs) within each sequence compartment (intact, defective and plasma viral sequences) was calculated for each participant. RESULTS: Defective proviral sequences harbored more DRMs than other sequence compartments, with a median DRM rate of 0.25 compared with intact sequences (0.0, P&#x200a;=&#x200a;0.014) and plasma sequences (0.095, P&#x200a;=&#x200a;0.30). Defective sequences with hypermutations were the major source of DRMs, with a median DRM rate of 1.0 compared with defective sequences without hypermutations (0.042, P&#x200a;<&#x200a;0.001). Certain Apolipoprotein B Editing Complex 3-related DRMs including reverse transcriptase gene mutations M184I, E138K, M230I, G190E and protease gene mutations M46I, D30N were enriched in hypermutated sequences but not in intact sequences or plasma sequences. All the hypermutated sequences had premature stop codons due to Apolipoprotein B Editing Complex 3. CONCLUSION: Proviral sequencing may overestimate DRMs as a result of hypermutations. Removing hypermutated sequences is essential in the interpretation of proviral drug resistance testing.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed2002

Inhibition of CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 infection by lipopolysaccharide: evidence of different mechanisms in macrophages and T lymphocytes.

Bacterial LPS protects primary human macrophages from infection by CCR5-tropic HIV-1 isolates through the release of the CC chemokines RANTES and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha and -1 beta. Here, we show that LPS also suppresses infection of macrophages by CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 isolates. A marked down-regulation of both CD4 and CXCR4 expression was associated with this effect. Furthermore, a soluble factor(s) released by macrophages upon LPS treatment inhibited infection with CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 isolate viruses in both macrophages and T lymphocytes. Infection of both cell types appeared to be blocked at the level of viral entry and was independent of stromal cell-derived factor-1, the only known natural ligand of CXCR4. Moreover, the suppressive effect of LPS was unrelated to the release of IFN-alpha and -beta, macrophage-derived chemokine, leukemia inhibitory factor, or TNF-alpha. These results suggest the existence of potent HIV-1 inhibitory factor(s), uncharacterized to date, released by activated cells of the mononuclear phagocytic system.

Anti-HIV Agents↗