Small relief.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to compare both subjective clinical outcomes and the objective stress response of laparoscopic and open abdominal rectopexy in patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse. Abdominal rectopexy for patients with rectal prolapse is well suited for a laparoscopic approach as no resection or anastomosis is necessary. METHODS: Forty patients with a full-thickness rectal prolapse were randomized before operation to a laparoscopic group and an open group. They agreed to conform to a clinical pathway (CP) of liquid diet (CP1) and full mobility (CP2) on day 1, solid diet (CP3) on day 2 and discharge (CP4) before day 5. Their compliance was monitored by an assessor blinded to the operative group, who also rated pain and mobility. Patient-controlled morphine use was documented. Neuroendocrine and immune stress response and respiratory function were measured. RESULTS: Some 75 per cent of all clinical pathway objectives of early recovery were achieved in the laparoscopic group compared with 37 per cent in the open group (P < 0.01). Significant differences in favour of laparoscopy were noted with regard to narcotic requirements, and pain and mobility scores. Differences in objective measures of stress response favouring laparoscopy were found for urinary catecholamines, interleukin 6, serum cortisol and C-reactive protein. No differences were noted in respiratory function but significant respiratory morbidity was greater in the open group (P < 0.05). None of the measured outcomes, subjective or objective, favoured the open group apart from operating time, which was significantly shorter (153 versus 102 min; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated significant subjective and objective differences in favour of a laparoscopic technique for abdominal rectopexy. The advantages were all short term but no evidence of any adverse effect on longer-term outcomes was observed.

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled↗

PubMed2002

Colostrum morphine concentrations during postcesarean intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.

UNLABELLED: Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine is a convenient method for providing postoperative analgesia. Despite the fact that it is used after cesarean delivery, data on transfer of morphine and of its active metabolite morphine-6 glucuronide (M6G) into maternal milk are scarce. It is not known whether breast-feeding during PCA with morphine has neonatal implications. We sought to measure morphine and M6G concentrations in colostrum during postpartum IV PCA and evaluate the potential for drug intake by neonates being breast-fed by these mothers. Seven informed and consenting mothers, given IV PCA with morphine, were investigated. Plasma and milk samples were obtained at titration, and at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. Morphine and M6G were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. In plasma, morphine concentrations ranged from <1 to 274 ng/mL, M6G ranged from <5 to 974 ng/mL. In milk, opioids were found in only 3 patients in whom morphine concentrations ranged from <1 to 48 ng/mL and M6G from <5 to 1084 ng/mL. The milk-to-plasma ratio was always <1 for morphine. In conclusion, we observed very small morphine and M6G concentrations in colostrum during PCA with morphine. Under these conditions, the amounts of drug likely to be transferred to the breast-fed neonate are negligible. IMPLICATIONS: Colostrum concentrations of morphine and its active metabolite morphine-6 glucuronide were measured in mothers receiving patient-controlled analgesia with morphine after cesarean delivery. The concentrations were found to be very small, thus supporting the safety of breast-feeding in mothers receiving IV patient-controlled analgesia with morphine.

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled↗