PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10499397

Framework for program evaluation in public health.

Abstract

Effective program evaluation is a systematic way to improve and account for public health actions by involving procedures that are useful, feasible, ethical, and accurate. The framework guides public health professionals in their use of program evaluation. It is a practical, nonprescriptive tool, designed to summarize and organize essential elements of program evaluation. The framework comprises steps in program evaluation practice and standards for effective program evaluation. Adhering to the steps and standards of this framework will allow an understanding of each program's context and will improve how program evaluations are conceived and conducted. Furthermore, the framework encourages an approach to evaluation that is integrated with routine program operations. The emphasis is on practical, ongoing evaluation strategies that involve all program stakeholders, not just evaluation experts. Understanding and applying the elements of this framework can be a driving force for planning effective public health strategies, improving existing programs, and demonstrating the results of resource investments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1999-09-17. Framework for program evaluation in public health.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10499397/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Using ethnography in the evaluation of drug prevention and intervention programs.

As more community-based substance-misuse prevention and intervention programs are funded by government and private agencies, innovative evaluation designs are required. Traditional impact or outcome evaluations based on quantitative experimental designs are not enough. Without discarding the use of statistically analyzed survey instruments, a triangulate evaluation approach centered on ethnographic fieldwork has proven successful in fulfilling this need. This paper discusses changing attitudes about ethnography in the evaluation field, describes the development and usefulness of ethnography in evaluation research, and reports on the incorporation of ethnography as part of a triangulation evaluation design as used by National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.

Program Evaluation↗

[Applications of the quality control program in diagnostic radiology. Confirmation of results, clinical and managerial benefits].

The Health Physics Department developed and implemented a QA program to test the X-ray equipment in Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy. The program was aimed at achieving "total quality" in diagnostic radiology. To this purpose, suggestions were taken from: the code of practice of the leading international committees; our personal experience over several years in measuring and evaluating radiologic equipment and finally data relative to the maintenance procedures for radiologic equipment. The Integrated Quality Assurance Program (IQAP) manages two different quality control sub-procedures: the first one (QF) monitors equipment performance with a view to providing more pieces of diagnostic information and to reducing both patient and staff dose; the other one (QG) plans maintenance service to reduce running costs. QF included: i) practical tests for X-ray equipment; ii) analysis, interpretation and comparison of results; iii) tolerance limits. QG provided information on: i) inventory; ii) user-service relationship; iii) suitability of any corrective actions. The data relative to the last four years are reported in the text. The regular and correct use of this integrated protocol is very useful to monitor the factors affecting image quality and to improve diagnostic radiology. Finally, the protocol allowed us to plan our "yearly maintenance contracts" better and to save money on running costs.

Program Evaluation↗

A study of the outcome of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery research grant program.

Since 1974, the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery has funded a competitive research grant program jointly administered by the Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation. The grant program was initiated to provide "seed money" to researchers in aesthetic surgery. A written survey of all recipients over a 6-year period from 1985 to 1990 was conducted to assess the productivity of the grant program. The survey suggests that seed money grants are effective and that there is a high rate of peer-reviewed publication and national presentation of completed projects. Suggestions for improvement of the grant program are also presented.

Program Evaluation↗