PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10499939

Selecting a rehabilitation program for people with stroke.

Abstract

This article reviews the 1997 Balanced Budget Act as it pertains to Medicare reimbursement and its consequent impact on medical rehabilitation in general and on persons with stroke in particular. Following a description of the concept and practice of "consumer choice" in health care today, the author frames "choice" in the context of outcomes management wherein the person with stroke may be provided with a report card that describes what outcomes the patient might expect following a course of rehabilitation. Today more than ever, patients are beginning to require information about provider performance that is easy to understand and allows for them to make intelligent purchasing decisions. Literature is reviewed that documents better stroke outcomes in specific types of rehabilitation settings. Finally, a variety of existing consumer tools are reviewed that assist the person with stroke in making an enlightened choice for an optimal setting for stroke rehabilitation. Unfortunately, persons with stroke may not consistently be able to exercise an educated choice because the payer may independently determine placement. An extensive consumer check list of quality indicators is provided to enable the patient's family and provider to evaluate the appropriateness of placing a person with stroke in a given setting.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Rao. 1999. Selecting a rehabilitation program for people with stroke.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10499939/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A compensation election for binary social choice.

We report experimental results examining the properties of a bidding mechanism, the "Compensation Election," which is designed to implement a simple binary choice between two options. We may think of the group decision problem as a choice between a new rule and the status quo. The rule and the status quo are each common outcomes that apply across all individuals, but the value or cost that they induce on each individual differs according to each individual's circumstances: some gain, some lose, and others are unaffected by a change to the new from the old. Rather than casting votes, each subject submits a bid reflecting his willingness to pay to induce the group to select one option and the amount he wishes to be paid if the alternative option is selected. The Compensation Election chooses the option that receives the highest sum of bids. We find that, although the Compensation Election allows subjects to strategically bid above their value (or even for the option they do not prefer), such behavior is not the norm. We also find that subjects' bids more truthfully reveal their values when there are more bidders in the election.

Choice Behavior↗

The effects of expanding patient choice of provider on waiting times: evidence from a policy experiment.

Long waiting times for inpatient treatment in the UK National Health Service have been a source of popular and political concern, and therefore a target for policy initiatives. In the London Patient Choice Project, patients at risk of breaching inpatient waiting time targets were offered the choice of an alternative hospital with a guaranteed shorter wait. This paper develops a simple theoretical model of the effect of greater patient choice on waiting times. It then uses a difference in difference econometric methodology to estimate the impact of the London choice project on ophthalmology waiting times. In line with the model predictions, the project led to shorter average waiting times in the London region and a convergence in waiting times amongst London hospitals.

Choice Behavior↗