PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10524328

Bacterial interference.

Abstract

Bacterial interactions, antagonistic and synergistic, help maintain the balance in the normal endogenous flora. The production of bacteriocins by microorganisms is one of the important mechanisms used for interference. The ability of various microorganisms to produce bacteriocins and exhibit interfering capability is detailed in the review. These organisms include Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. The role of bacterial interference (BI) in clinical infections and the effect of this phenomenon on their eradication is detailed. The infections discussed include those of the upper respiratory (pharyngo-tonsillitis, otitis media), urogenital, and gastrointestinal tracts. The influence of antimicrobial agents on these organisms and their interactions with other bacteria are also described.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Brook. 1999. Bacterial interference.. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408419991299211

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Pseudomonas-Candida interactions: an ecological role for virulence factors.

Bacterial-fungal interactions have great environmental, medical, and economic importance, yet few have been well characterized at the molecular level. Here, we describe a pathogenic interaction between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans, two opportunistic pathogens. P. aeruginosa forms a dense biofilm on C. albicans filaments and kills the fungus. In contrast, P. aeruginosa neither binds to nor kills yeast-form C. albicans. Several P. aeruginosa virulence factors that are important in disease are involved in the killing of C. albicans filaments. We propose that many virulence factors studied in the context of human infection may also have a role in bacterial-fungal interactions.

Antibiosis↗

ITS region of Pythium canariense sp. nov., its morphology and its interaction with Botrytis cinerea.

A new species Pythium canariense (CI-07), isolated from soil samples taken in the San Nicolas region of the Canary islands (Gran Canaria, Spain), is being described here. This species is characterised by its spherical to pyriform, intercalary to catenulate sporangia, smooth-walled terminal oogonia supplied with monoclinous and diclinous antheridia which at times are branched and wrap around the female gametangia. The fungus has an antagonistic effect on Botrytis cinerea, the grey mould fungus. Morphological features are being given here together with the sequence of the complete internal transcribed spacer region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA of the fungus, its comparison with related species, and some aspects of its antagonistic behaviour with B. cinerea.

Antibiosis↗

A polyphasic approach for studying the interaction between Ralstonia solanacearum and potential control agents in the tomato phytosphere.

Ralstonia solanacearum biovar 2, the causative agent of brown rot in potato, has been responsible for large crop losses in Northwest Europe during the last decade. Knowledge on the ecological behaviour of R. solanacearum and its antagonists is required to develop sound procedures for its control and eradication in infested fields.A polyphasic approach was used to study the invasion of plants by a selected R. solanacearum biovar 2 strain, denoted 1609, either or not in combination with the antagonistic strains Pseudomonas corrugata IDV1 and P. fluorescens UA5-40. Thus, this study combined plating (spread and drop plate methods), reporter gene technology (gfp mutants) and serological (imunofluorescence colony staining [IFC]) and molecular techniques (fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH], PCR with R. solanacearum specific primers and PCR-DGGE on plant DNA extracts). The behaviour of R. solanacearum 1609 and the two control strains was studied in bulk and (tomato) rhizosphere soil and the rhizoplane and stems of tomato plants. The results showed that an interaction between the pathogen and the control strains at the root surface was likely. In particular, R. solanacearum 1609 CFU numbers were significantly reduced on tomato roots treated with P. corrugata IDV1(chr:gfp1) cells as compared to those on untreated roots. Concomitant with the presence of P. corrugata IDV1(chr:gfp1), plant invasion by the pathogen was hampered, but not abolished.PCR-DGGE analyses of the tomato rhizoplane supported the evidence for antagonistic activity against the pathogen; as only weak R. solanacearum 1609 specific bands were detected in profiles derived from mixed systems versus strong bands in profiles from systems containing only the pathogen. Using FISH, a difference in root colonization was demonstrated between the pathogen and one of the two antagonists, i.e. P. corrugata IDV1(chr:gfp1); R. solanacearum strain 1609 was clearly detected in the vascular cylinder of tomato plants, whereas strain IDV1 was absent.R. solanacearum 1609 cells were also detected in stems of plants that had developed in soils treated with this strain, even in cases in which disease symptoms were absent, indicating the occurrence of symptomless infection. In contrast, strain 1609 cells were not found in stems of several plants treated with either one of the two antagonists. The polyphasic analysis is valuable for testing antagonistic strains for approval as biocontrol agents in agricultural practice.

Antibiosis↗