PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 10528981

The maximum pharmacodynamic effect as a response parameter: pharmacokinetic considerations.

Abstract

In previous human in-vivo studies measuring the maximum pharmacodynamic response to characterize cutaneously applied ointment preparations, it was observed that differences between various formulations caused by penetration enhancement led to different enhancement factors depending on the method used for determination of these factors from activity-response curves. To clarify this discrepancy, pharmacokinetic simulations have been performed based on an open one-compartment model with either first- or zero-order drug penetration kinetics and first-order elimination kinetics. Under the assumption that the maximum pharmacodynamic response corresponds to the maximum effective drug concentration in the receptor compartment, which represents the difference between the maximum drug concentration and the threshold concentration, drug concentration vs time profiles and dose-response curves were simulated. In addition, maximum effective concentrations were calculated and plotted against the logarithm of the thermodynamic drug activity to obtain activity-response curves. Relative bioavailability and enhancement factors were determined either from the horizontal distance between the curves of a standard and a test preparation, or as the ratio of the maximum effective concentration of test and standard formulations. A significant difference between the first-order and the zero-order input kinetics with regard to the evaluation of bioavailability and drug penetration enhancement was shown. Under finite dose conditions, i.e. first-order input kinetics from solution-type preparations, a misestimation of the factors usually occurs. Only under infinite dose conditions, i.e. if large preparation volumes are applied to achieve zero-order input kinetics, is the determination of bioavailability and enhancement factors from dose- and activity-response curves accurate.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C S Leopold. 1999. The maximum pharmacodynamic effect as a response parameter: pharmacokinetic considerations.. https://doi.org/10.1211/0022357991773465

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Endosonographic and manometric evaluation of internal anal sphincter in patients with chronic anal fissure and its correlation with clinical outcome after topical glyceryl trinitrate therapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Anorectal pressure studies have demonstrated internal anal sphincter (IAS) hypertonia in patients with chronic anal fissure. It is unknown however, if these changes in IAS function are associated with any abnormality in sphincter morphology. The first aim was to investigate the clinical characteristics and the manometric and endosonographic findings of the IAS in a cohort of patients with chronic anal fissure. The second aim was to investigate the association between these findings and the outcome with topical Glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who presented with chronic anal fissure from November 1999 to May 2004 were included after failure of conservative therapy. Anorectal manometry and anal endosonography were performed before treatment with 0.2% GTN ointment twice daily was initiated. Patients were evaluated after 8 weeks. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-four patients (66 women, mean age, 45.2 +/- 14.8 years) were included. Hypertonia of the IAS was found in 84 (68%) patients. The mean maximum IAS thickness was 3.6 +/- 0.76 mm (1.6-5.5). An abnormally thick IAS, adjusted by age, was observed in 113 (91.1%) patients. We found no correlation between resting pressure and IAS thickness (r = 0.074; p = 0.41). At 8 weeks, 52 patients (42%) had healed with complete symptoms resolution. No statistically significant differences were observed when clinical features and manometric and endosonographic findings were compared between healing and no-healing fissures. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with chronic anal fissure present an abnormally thick IAS. Clinical, manometric and endosonographic features had no association with outcome after GTN treatment.

Administration, Topical↗

Topical use of antifibrinolytic agents reduces postoperative bleeding: a double-blind, prospective, randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative bleeding is still one of the most common complications of cardiac surgery. Antifibrinolytic agents successfully reduce bleeding, but there are controversies concerning adverse effects after their systemic use. By topical application of antifibrinolytic agents in pericardial cavity, most of these effects are avoided. We compared the effects of topically applied aprotinin, tranexamic acid and placebo on postoperative bleeding and transfusion requirements. METHODS: In this single-center prospective, randomized, double-blind trial, 300 adult cardiac patients were randomized into three groups to receive one million IU of aprotinin (AP group), 2.5g of tranexamic acid (TA group) or placebo (PL group) topically before sternal closure. Groups were comparable with respect to all preoperative and intraoperative variables. Postoperative bleeding, transfusion requirements and hematologic parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: Postoperative bleeding within first 12-h period (AP group 433+/-294 [350; 360]ml, TA group 391+/-255 [350; 305]ml, PL group 613+/-505 [525; 348]ml), as well as cumulative blood loss within 24h (AP group 726+/-432 [640; 525]ml, TA group 633+/-343 [545; 335]ml, PL group 903+/-733 [800; 445]ml), showed statistically significant inter-group differences (both p<0.001). Bleeding rates values were significantly higher in placebo group compared to the groups treated with antifibrinolytic agents (AP and TA groups) concerning both variables. Although TA group showed the lowest values, no statistical differences between TA and AP groups were found. Inter-group difference of blood product requirements was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Topical use of either tranexamic acid or aprotinin efficiently reduces postoperative bleeding. TA seems to be at least as potent as aprotinin, but potentially safer and with better cost-effectiveness ratio.

Administration, Topical↗