PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 10531521

The finer things in X-ray diffraction data collection.

J W Pflugrath
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

X-ray diffraction images from two-dimensional position-sensitive detectors can be characterized as thick or thin, depending on whether the rotation-angle increment per image is greater than or less than the crystal mosaicity, respectively. The expectations and consequences of the processing of thick and thin images in terms of spatial overlap, saturated pixels, X-ray background and I/sigma(I) are discussed. The d*TREK software suite for processing diffraction images is briefly introduced, and results from d*TREK are compared with those from another popular package.

Explore related subjects

Electronic Data ProcessingEndonucleasesMyoglobinSerratia marcescensSoftwareX-Ray DiffractionJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J W Pflugrath. 1999. The finer things in X-ray diffraction data collection.. https://doi.org/10.1107/s090744499900935x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Automated extraction of information on protein-protein interactions from the biological literature.

MOTIVATION: To understand biological process, we must clarify how proteins interact with each other. However, since information about protein-protein interactions still exists primarily in the scientific literature, it is not accessible in a computer-readable format. Efficient processing of large amounts of interactions therefore needs an intelligent information extraction method. Our aim is to develop an efficient method for extracting information on protein-protein interaction from scientific literature. RESULTS: We present a method for extracting information on protein-protein interactions from the scientific literature. This method, which employs only a protein name dictionary, surface clues on word patterns and simple part-of-speech rules, achieved high recall and precision rates for yeast (recall = 86.8% and precision = 94.3%) and Escherichia coli (recall = 82.5% and precision = 93.5%). The result of extraction suggests that our method should be applicable to any species for which a protein name dictionary is constructed. AVAILABILITY: The program is available on request from the authors.

Electronic Data Processing↗
PubMed2001

Does participation in the electronic residency application service (ERAS) affect the quality of applications to a residency program?

PURPOSE: To determine whether the quality of applicants to an emergency medicine (EM) residency would improve during a year that the program did not participate in the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS). METHODS: Applications to the Denver Health Medical Center Residency in Emergency Medicine (DHMCREM) were retrospectively compared for three consecutive years: 1996-97, during which ERAS was not available to EM programs; 1997-98, during which DHMCREM did not participate in ERAS; and 1998-99, during which DHMCREM participated in ERAS. The quality of applicants was based on their application scores, which were determined using a 20-point equation that rated individual attributes: U.S. Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 score, medical school, research, extracurricular activities, personal statement, letters of recommendation, and dean's letter. T-tests were used to compare application scores and individual attributes among applicants, those invited for an interview, and those who matched to the program. In addition, numbers of applications to the DHMCREM were compared with national trends. RESULTS: A total of 1,318 complete applications were reviewed for the three-year study period. There was a 50% reduction in applications during 1997-98 when DHMCREM did not participate in ERAS, which did not correlate with the national trend in applications to residency programs. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the quality of applicants, interviewees, or matched candidates as defined by the overall application score. In addition, applicants who matched to the program were higher on the rank-order list during the 1997-98 application year than were applicants who matched for the year prior to ERAS and for the year DHMCREM participated in ERAS. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in ERAS increased the number of applicants, but did not correlate with an increase in the quality of applicants.

Electronic Data Processing↗